![]() | Home > General & Technical (L663) > Commercial Variant |
|
|
|
| General Member Since: 23 Jan 2021 Location: Lincolnshire Posts: 24
|
Yes it is but if that’s an aerial then the HT would need it too.
|
||
|
| DSL Member Since: 20 Aug 2007 Location: Wandering the wasteland. Posts: 837
|
True, good thinking.
|
||
|
| CarMan Member Since: 29 Nov 2010 Location: Cotswolds Posts: 1913
|
More practical for sure Steve, but I've had one 110 which didn't stay long and countless 90's - so on this occasion I am pretty confident where my heart is, the 110 in the same colour on the same pitch didn't seem to do it for me - but agree about the rubber
|
||
|
| Romadog Member Since: 07 Jul 2011 Location: Powys Posts: 1751 |
a 90 looks great but 110 will be more practicable and defo chunky tyres
|
||
|
| Farmerben Member Since: 16 Jan 2017 Location: Herefordshire Posts: 607
|
Always been in the 90 (or 8 |
||
|
| General Member Since: 23 Jan 2021 Location: Lincolnshire Posts: 24
|
Managed to have a close look at a hard top with white side panels at a dealer near where I’m working and it appears the panels are stuck directly on the glass side windows.
Click image to enlarge |
||
|
| familymad Member Since: 13 Dec 2011 Location: Bucks Posts: 3502
|
Fits more like a classic Defender with those shut lines ... 1951 80" S1 2.0
1995 110 300TDI 1995 90 300TDI |
||
|
| Avelingporter Member Since: 25 Jan 2016 Location: Southampton Posts: 409
|
I cant find it on the configurator, but can you order the commercial version without the full height bulkhead behind the seats? More like the old style in the D3/D4 commercial. Removable style cage, maybe half height at best.
|
||
|
| DSL Member Since: 20 Aug 2007 Location: Wandering the wasteland. Posts: 837
|
Not that I’ve seen, bulkhead only. From the pics it doesn’t look too difficult to remove but no idea if that matches reality.
|
||
|
| camelman Member Since: 27 Feb 2013 Location: Peak District Posts: 3417
|
Am I right in thinking the 110 Commercial will require a Class 7 MOT going forward as its over 3050Kg GVW and not a Dual Purpose vehicle?
The lightest config I can see is 2420kg Unladen / 3150 GVW ![]() |
||
|
| Farmerben Member Since: 16 Jan 2017 Location: Herefordshire Posts: 607
|
If that's the case then surely the Disco commercial should also be Class 7? GVW 3170 for the D300. https://instagram.com/bentheoandrews
|
||
|
| blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 18040
|
Yes.
Yes. |
||
|
| dontwakemeup Member Since: 28 Feb 2021 Location: Oz Posts: 55
|
I've had a look at the commercial variant online for those of you pondering adding seats etc.
Looks like the rear airbags are removed as well etc. So there is a bit of difference. |
||
|
| Tom_T Member Since: 08 Nov 2020 Location: Essex Posts: 87
|
Most pick ups have a GVM of over 3050kg but they are classed as dual purpose vehicles. Out of interest (and because I don’t know) why wouldn’t the defender be classed as dual purpose? Is it because it only has a front row of seats?
|
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis








