↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > General & Technical (L663) > The new 90
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 6 of 18 <123 ... 567 ... 161718>
Print this entire topic · 
Ads90



Member Since: 16 Jun 2008
Location: Cots-on-the-Wolds
Posts: 800
United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 CSW Keswick Green
Yeah I get the vat thing, I was more thinking that if the vat wasn’t reclaimable (as I think was alluded to above) then you’d be better off buying a sw even if you took the rear seats out to use as a van.
Post #854126 3rd Sep 2020 8:59pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2054
United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
My understanding (might be wrong......) is that the HMRC case is about the company car tax rules and personal benefits rather than VAT as such.......
Post #854128 3rd Sep 2020 9:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Brucech



Member Since: 15 Oct 2018
Location: Perthshire
Posts: 10
United Kingdom 1998 Defender 90 V8 Petrol 50th Auto Chawton White
Just received my invite to see the new 90 & Hard Top at the Perth dealer on the 11th Oct.
Post #854716 7th Sep 2020 2:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ads90



Member Since: 16 Jun 2008
Location: Cots-on-the-Wolds
Posts: 800
United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 CSW Keswick Green
The hard top/commercial 90?
Post #854720 7th Sep 2020 3:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Brucech



Member Since: 15 Oct 2018
Location: Perthshire
Posts: 10
United Kingdom 1998 Defender 90 V8 Petrol 50th Auto Chawton White
Both models, 90 & Hardtop, are mentioned in the e-mail.
Post #854741 7th Sep 2020 4:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
90 Dreamer wrote:
My understanding (might be wrong......) is that the HMRC case is about the company car tax rules and personal benefits rather than VAT as such.......


Yes not VAT related but surely applicable to a hard top where there's personal use?
Post #854747 7th Sep 2020 5:28pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2054
United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
But personal use is relevant in any HMRC regs regardless of the classification of the vehicle used.......

I know a couple of guys with logo'd vans that were 'caught' getting shopping in at the local supermarket and had to file P11D (or whatever its called) forms.......
Post #854799 7th Sep 2020 8:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Yes but there's a large difference in the financial impact between the two.
Post #854842 7th Sep 2020 10:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2054
United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
Between what, sorry??
Post #854843 7th Sep 2020 10:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Chicken Drumstick



Member Since: 17 Aug 2020
Location: Near MK
Posts: 544
United Kingdom 
J77 wrote:
^ it’s 4583mm including the tyre, I think it’s just over 4300mm excluding the tyre.



Click image to enlarge

I'm not going to dispute the actual figure. But that diagram you have posted is not the same as the one Tim did.

e.g. clearly showing the length does not include the spare:

Post #854911 8th Sep 2020 10:24am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Chicken Drumstick



Member Since: 17 Aug 2020
Location: Near MK
Posts: 544
United Kingdom 
fisha wrote:
I have to laugh at the comments regarding the rear seats. Some people really seem to forget what the previous 90 was like. In the rear, you had either

- no seats ( but reasonable boot space )
- side facing not very comfy bench seats where you could rest your chin on your knees and ate into the boot space
- front facing seats where your feet sat to the side slightly and ate up even more boot space.

Now you have a combination decent rear seats, which when folded leave the whole boot space with a small step of a few inches in the rear floor. Disaster !


Not really relevant though is it. The old 90 was a completely different kind of vehicle.
Post #854912 8th Sep 2020 10:26am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
J77



Member Since: 04 Nov 2019
Location: Fife
Posts: 3247
Scotland 
Chicken Drumstick wrote:
J77 wrote:
^ it’s 4583mm including the tyre, I think it’s just over 4300mm excluding the tyre.



Click image to enlarge

I'm not going to dispute the actual figure. But that diagram you have posted is not the same as the one Tim did.

e.g. clearly showing the length does not include the spare:



Mines from the latest brochure, overall length must include the tyre, I would’ve thought.


The personal spec brochures give better details of the dimensions


Click image to enlarge
Post #854922 8th Sep 2020 11:02am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
walfy



Member Since: 29 Aug 2007
Location: Frome
Posts: 2642
 
90 Dreamer wrote:
Ads90 wrote:
If there is little difference in purchasing cost between the commercial & SW versions, best consider which would have the best resale value - I'd have thought the sw would retain more?


If your a business then the actual TAX / VAT designation makes a huuuge difference.......currently the 'classic' Defender can only be run commercially in 90 HT form, a SW would attract company car tax and be non VAT qualifying


Really?? I think my acountant has it wrong then Rolling with laughter Rolling with laughter . I've been running my 63 plate 110 USW as a commercial vehicle since new and claimed the VAT back.
The BiK is a huge amount different to the SW version, talking £k's, as it's only me and the MRs and the 2 dogs it made sense not to have the 3rd row seats and no rear windows.
Now looking at the 110 hardtop to replace it with 110 D250 SE HT
110 USW SOLD
RRE HSE Dynamic Gone, wife killed it
VOLVO XC60 R Dynamic with some toys

Polaris RZR 900XP SOLD
Post #855182 9th Sep 2020 3:27pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
J77



Member Since: 04 Nov 2019
Location: Fife
Posts: 3247
Scotland 

Click image to enlarge


Click image to enlarge
Post #855183 9th Sep 2020 3:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Smilesapart



Member Since: 28 Sep 2013
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 735
United Kingdom 
Ads90 wrote:
If there is little difference in purchasing cost between the commercial & SW versions, best consider which would have the best resale value - I'd have thought the sw would retain more?


There is almost no financial gain when buying it to get a commercial version unless you’re VAT registered. Which I’m not. Therefore it would make no sense to me at all to choose the Commercial version Sold the Puma Defender and bought a brand new Pangea Green 2020 Defender D240 S with a few factory extras!
Post #855188 9th Sep 2020 3:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 6 of 18 <123 ... 567 ... 161718>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
<  Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums