↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > INEOS Grenadier > Who is going to buy it?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 12 of 13 <123 ... 111213>
Print this entire topic · 
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16809

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
No doubt I will regret asking this, but are you taking issue with my comparison of £30k Disco 2 with an £80k new Defender, or my comarison of a £30k Disco 2 with a £50k Grenadier? Or did you simply misread my post and think I am saying that the Defender and Grenadier are functionally equivalent?*

If the former, perhaps you would like to tell me what useful additional functionality the Defender has that the Disco 2 lacks?

If the latter, perhaps you'd like to tell me what useful functionality the Disco 2 has that the Grenadier lacks?



* I haven't said this, since I know that the Defender has a lot of unnecessary and to me undesirable crap that the Grenadier doesn't.
Post #907392 11th Jun 2021 11:23am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
blackwolf wrote:
From what I have seen, the Grenadier is likely to provide functional equivalence at a significantly lower price than an £80k Defender


Ultimately depends on how narrow your definition of “functional” is. If it’s a 4WD car with some ground clearance, 5/7 seats, a bit of space in the back and the ability to tow 3.5t, that’s quite restrictive - and there are lots of crude, unpleasant old clankers that are “functionally equivalent”.

What I can tell you is that the breadth of ability a new Defender has is an awful lot wider than that of an old Discovery, and the fundamental part of that is because it doesn’t have entirely outmoded underpinnings. Which the Grenadire does.
Post #907394 11th Jun 2021 11:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Retroanaconda



Member Since: 04 Jan 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2520

Scotland 
I’m not sure it’s a clear cut as that. Yes the solid beam axles are old tech but they are still used in commercial/utility applications around the world as they have a number of advantages in those applications.

The new Defender is primarily a passenger-carrying car not a utility vehicle and so it makes sense for it to have independent suspension. The Disco 2 had beam axles as a development of the D1/RRC platform but no one would argue that the comfort and handling improved when the D3 went to an independently-sprung setup.

Blackwolf: It must have been a very highly-specced D2 to need to spend £80k to get an L663 to the same level? Mine is a base spec model and has all the toys I could ever envisage wanting.
Post #907395 11th Jun 2021 11:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bluest



Member Since: 23 Apr 2016
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3993

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
The one thing the outmoded underpinnings may provide, that JLR products do not, is durability in arduous use. Granted there is likely a very small market willing to pay a high price for that, but that is what Ineos are counting on. They aren’t going for big sales figures. The Land Rover’s complex suspension and terrain response is awesome, I don’t think anyone disagrees with that, but is not well suited to heavy duty applications. I’m not saying you cant use a new Defender for that, but that over time a simpler more robust vehicle would be the better choice, especially or a fleet, even if technically it is not as competent.

This car is trying to rival the 70 series Land Cruiser and Merc G-professional with some crossover with Nissan Patrol, Land Cruiser 300, Mitsubishi Challenger, G-professional! double cab pick ups etc, not the new Defender. I don’t even think Grenadier is much of a rival for Wranglers and Broncos, as they are more aimed at the fun/ leisure market. Personally it is these rivalries that interest me and I think Ineos have their work cut out still.

The keep arguing whether is technically compariable/superior to the new Defender seems pointless to me. Different tools for different jobs. Might as well say it doesn’t handle as well as a McLaren Senna, or can’t match the fuel consumption of Prius. 2007 110 TDCi Station Wagon XS
Post #907396 11th Jun 2021 12:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
Solid axles are used in commercial vehicles because it’s an awful lot simpler (read an awful lot cheaper) to make one work carrying heavier loads, and all driving dynamics are secondary to that.
Post #907397 11th Jun 2021 12:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
As for simplicity - those BMW engines and ZF gearboxes are about as far from simple as it’s possible for a powertrain to get in 2021.
Post #907398 11th Jun 2021 12:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
22900013A



Member Since: 23 Dec 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 3136

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Keswick Green
Philip wrote:
Functional equivalence? Only in the most very basic sense, it simply can’t have the breath of abilities that a new Defender has when it’s on the underpinnings of a 1960s army truck. There are good reasons new-fangled ideas like independent suspension and steering racks have become ubiquitous.


Out of curiosity what 1960s army truck are you referring to? I thought the Grenadier was all-new? 2011 110 USW
1973 Series III 1-Ton
1972 Series III 1-Ton Cherrypicker
1969 IIA 1-Ton
1966 IIA 88"
Post #907399 11th Jun 2021 12:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
All-new insomuch as anything with a separate chassis, two solid axles and a steering box can be.
Post #907400 11th Jun 2021 12:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
blackwolf wrote:
What I do welcome is the widening of choice for the buyer

This in spades, I struggle to understand how this can be deemed a negative.

Talking of outmoded underpinnings, the new Defender should have been the first vehicle on the MLA platform (as should have all JLR offerings from 2020 onwards); instead it had a warmed over version of the D7. Nothing wrong with that, but if you are going to knock something based on age alone, then let's not pretend it's cutting edge in today's market.
Post #907406 11th Jun 2021 12:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bluest



Member Since: 23 Apr 2016
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3993

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
Philip wrote:
As for simplicity - those BMW engines and ZF gearboxes are about as far from simple as it’s possible for a powertrain to get in 2021.


I agree, and think the choice of engine and gearbox is the thing I like the least. Although at least it’s not a DSG. This vehicle does not need 250bhp+. A more utilitarian 4 cylinder option would have been nice with a 6 speed manual box. Even the big V8 diesel in the Land Cruiser can’t muster more than 200bhp, presumably for durability reasons. 2007 110 TDCi Station Wagon XS
Post #907407 11th Jun 2021 12:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16809

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Philip wrote:
Solid axles are used in commercial vehicles because it’s an awful lot simpler (read an awful lot cheaper) to make one work carrying heavier loads, and all driving dynamics are secondary to that.


Hmm, benefits - simpler, cheaper, fewer parts to wear out or fail. Disbenefits = poorer driving dynamics.

On a multipurpose vehicle not intended for performance road use, I know which I would rather have.

I have never found the road manners of either my Disco2 or my Defender in any way unsatisfactory, and both are on MTs.
Post #907410 11th Jun 2021 1:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bluest



Member Since: 23 Apr 2016
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3993

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
I think the solid axle is cheaper point is only applicable at the bottom of the market with leaf springs like on the rear of pickups. When you get into 5 link designs with coil springs like Grenadier will have there’s probably not much in it. There’s certainly more actual material in a solid axle set up. I don’t think cost is the driving factor in Ineos’ design choices.

Separate chassis is also not an obsolete choice for the intended market. With a unibody, the ability to customise and adapt becomes very limited and makes offering different body configurations harder. Look at all the specials that were built on Classic Defender chassis that just wouldn’t be possible on unibody design.

Of course, both of those bring compromises which aren’t desirable in a mass market vehicle, but that’s not what the Grenadier is. 2007 110 TDCi Station Wagon XS
Post #907412 11th Jun 2021 1:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
Solid axles are far cheaper in terms of both development and construction - given that, it should be telling that everything (including the US stuff) is moving to independent. Looking at the construction pictures of the Grenadier’s body, I’m also not sure it’s going to lend itself to custom rebodies like an old Defender or a cheapo pickup would. Has there been mention of a chassis cab?
Post #907415 11th Jun 2021 1:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5765

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
I would certainly agree with Blackwolf that the D2 and ND are ‘functionally’ equivalent, and this should not be conflated with ‘technologically’ equivalent, which they’re clearly not.

But it’s important to mention that this is relative to the generation in which they were developed and launched, and how they fared against other 4x4s of the day, most notably the Defender of the day. The D2 was designed to be good off road, (as good if not better than the Defender), better on road than the Defender, more comfortable for passengers, more driver luxuries (better AC, auto gearbox option, nicer seats and sound proofing etc), have a spacious boot, option for roof rack and be good at towing. It was a mix of a ‘more comfortable’ Defender and a ‘cheaper’ Range Rover. Bought by people who mainly wanted it as a road biased day-to-day car with good off road abilities, people who couldn’t live with the agricultural nature of the Defender or need the full on luxury of the Range Rover. Which, um, sounds exactly like the new Def to me.

As for the ‘breadth’ of abilities of the ND, what would those be exactly? It can drive (capably) on road, (very capably) off road, can carry five passengers in comfort, can have its AC turned on, turned up, turned down and turned off, can play music through speakers, can carry stuff in its boot with seats up or down, can carry stuff on the roof (if you choose the roof rack) and can tow. Apart from the clear, industry leading capability off road (which even a JLR insider said would be used by less than 5% of models sold) that’s a description of every SUV on the planet. Unless I’ve missed something? Or do you mean all the manner of ways it is already being pimped as the new go-to SUV for Footballers and Influencers? Like this little beauty:

https://www.motor1.com/news/513354/2021-la...-startech/ Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #907601 13th Jun 2021 6:27am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ResGuy68



Member Since: 15 May 2021
Location: Austin
Posts: 26

United States 
There's a reason why people buy wranglers and 4runners for offroading and not glammed up land rovers.

The linked off-road test (below) is quite illustrative.

Link;


Body on frame, solid-axel (4runner rear), and mechanical differentials hold very real off-road benefits. Electronic alternatives and fancy marketing can attempt to overcome these advantages. However, there will still be differences (capability, reliability, customizability)

I do wonder how the defender could have performed with a proper lift and tires. However, the cost of kitting out such a mod on the unibody design would likely be insanely expensive. By comparison, a decent 3 inch lift on a wrangler can be achieved with $1200 in parts and 5 hours of labor.
Post #907710 13th Jun 2021 11:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 12 of 13 <123 ... 111213>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums