↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Which Fox Shocks?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
Bucko



Member Since: 21 Nov 2016
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 43
England 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Orkney Grey
Which Fox Shocks?
Looking at Fox Shocks and pondering the options, and my initial thoughts were that I’d need the adjustable remote reservoir ones, for no other reason than the compulsion to fiddle and adjust things for fiddling sake. The reality is that once they are adjusted to ones preferred set up, they probably wouldn’t need touching again.

So, how about the non adjustable remote reservoir shocks? But again, is there really any need for the remote reservoir unless the shock is going to be taking such a pounding, working hard enough and creating such excessive heat as to justify the need for an extra reservoir?

Back to the standard fox shocks then? Not quite as cool as having a remote reservoir and being adjustable, but are these all you could possibly need for the every day use? They’re considerably cheaper.

Any thoughts and experiences on the various fox shocks options?
Post #888876 3rd Mar 2021 9:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Badger110



Member Since: 06 Feb 2018
Location: South hams
Posts: 1025
United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Buckingham Blue
Unless you're running rough roads all day or extreme usage off road I can't see the need for remote shocks.

Ive spent the past week or so looking at Fox and other makes and I would fit remotes as I'm likely to be using them in rough areas for long periods, however the pro 2's are a pretty good shock on their own from what I can gather through reading up on them.

To make a good decision, you need to work out what you want to achieve with them as it's a slippery slope to spending too much money Laughing
Post #888901 3rd Mar 2021 10:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Co1



Member Since: 19 Aug 2018
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3616
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Loire Blue
I have the 2.0’s without remote res. I’ve had B6’s and standard shocks as well in the same vehicle. The comfort on road is better on the 2.0 without question. The grip off road is better with the 2.0, again noticeably so. No brainier!
Post #888933 4th Mar 2021 7:08am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bucko



Member Since: 21 Nov 2016
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 43
England 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Orkney Grey
I’m already on the slippery slope to spending too much money, that just seems to be defender ownership in general.

I didn’t even really think I needed to upgrade the suspension but after reading how well the fox shocks have gone down, it seems I do.

Suspension upgrade is now next on the to do list.
Post #888975 4th Mar 2021 11:44am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Co1



Member Since: 19 Aug 2018
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3616
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Loire Blue
Welcome to the club Bucko!
Post #888983 4th Mar 2021 12:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zed



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: In the woods
Posts: 3021
United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
Standard 2.0’s are great for lighter trucks but if you tow, travel loaded or own a 110 then adjustable will be much better. WARNING.
This post may contain sarcasm.
Post #888986 4th Mar 2021 12:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jonny



Member Since: 10 Mar 2013
Location: North Wilts
Posts: 143
As per the ebay thread, the non-adjustable shocks can be rebuilt to adjustable spec, and with the current deal from JE it works out considerably cheaper than buying the adjustable ones at retail prices...
Post #889012 4th Mar 2021 2:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Co1



Member Since: 19 Aug 2018
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3616
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Loire Blue
Zed wrote:
Standard 2.0’s are great for lighter trucks but if you tow, travel loaded or own a 110 then adjustable will be much better.

Just to add to that, my recommendations above are based on a 90 HT. Cant speak for other variants.
Post #889157 5th Mar 2021 7:00am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bucko



Member Since: 21 Nov 2016
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 43
England 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Orkney Grey
After much deliberation, I have finally committed to a full suspension upgrade.

Fox 2.0 shocks (plus protection boots)
Eibach standard height comfort springs
Eibach rear anti-roll bar
Super-pro bushes all round

All courtesy of Alive, should be fitted this week. Can’t wait.
Post #901347 4th May 2021 4:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LR90XS2011



Member Since: 05 Apr 2011
Location: bickenhill
Posts: 3614
United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Galway Green
please give us an update on how it feels when you get it back DEFENDER 90 TDCI XS,

I hope everyone is well and your land rovers make you happy
Post #901350 4th May 2021 5:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Co1



Member Since: 19 Aug 2018
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3616
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Loire Blue
Good combo. Exactly the same set up as on my 90. Much more civilised a drive!
Post #901356 4th May 2021 6:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JOW240725



Member Since: 04 May 2015
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7873
United Kingdom 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Orkney Grey
Sounds good, look forward to hearing how it changes. Particularly, the comfort springs which seem to get very varied reviews. James
MY2012 110 2.2TDCi XS SW Orkney Grey - http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic43410.html
MY1990 110 200TDi SW beautifully faded Portofino Red - https://www.defender2.net/forum/post743641.html#743641
MY1984 90 V8 Slate Grey - https://www.defender2.net/forum/post744557.html#744557
Instagram @suffolk_rovers
Post #901362 4th May 2021 7:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90GTR



Member Since: 05 May 2020
Location: London
Posts: 198
2016 Defender 90 V8 Petrol Works V8 Auto Santorini Black
Co1 wrote:
I have the 2.0’s without remote res. I’ve had B6’s and standard shocks as well in the same vehicle. The comfort on road is better on the 2.0 without question. The grip off road is better with the 2.0, again noticeably so. No brainier!


Out of curiosity, what tyres have you paired with this setup?
Post #901374 4th May 2021 8:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bear100



Member Since: 22 Mar 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1868
Wales 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Santorini Black
I carried out a fair bit of research when choosing my next shocks, and came to the conclusion I’m not going to be a heavy user of rough roads at speed and as such fitted the 2.0’s without the remote reservoir.
They had some work on a recent overland around the alps and they worked fantastically well on and off the road. Well recommend 2016 Range Rover Autobiography 4.4 TDV8
2010 110 XS Utility 2.4TDCI
2010 Range Rover Sport TDV8 (gone)
2007 Discovery HSE TDV6 (gone)
1993 110 csw 200 tdi (gone)
1994 90 HT 300 tdi (gone)
1994 discovery 300tdi (gone)
90 hybrid 3.5 v8 (gone)
Range rover bobtail 3.5 v8 (gone)
Post #901375 4th May 2021 8:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Co1



Member Since: 19 Aug 2018
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3616
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Loire Blue
90GTR wrote:
Co1 wrote:
I have the 2.0’s without remote res. I’ve had B6’s and standard shocks as well in the same vehicle. The comfort on road is better on the 2.0 without question. The grip off road is better with the 2.0, again noticeably so. No brainier!


Out of curiosity, what tyres have you paired with this setup?


BFG KO2s at about 28psi on road. Off road varies.
Post #901379 4th May 2021 8:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
<  Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums