↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Sound Proofing Experiences
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
bm52



Member Since: 04 Apr 2010
Location: Kent
Posts: 2189

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Havana
Miserableolgit wrote:
I fitted a full NK kit to a couple of my TD5's and they made a marked difference - especially the under-bonnet and blanket. I've not found the noise in the Puma's that intrusive compared to earlier models so haven't bothered but might be tempted with an engine blanket.


my thoughts as well.
being a complete sado i have jsut downloaded a decibel app for my phone and i am going to compare the Puma with the FL to see if there is a marked difference before i buy anything. BM52
Post #93468 9th Oct 2011 8:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bm52



Member Since: 04 Apr 2010
Location: Kent
Posts: 2189

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Havana
decision time.
after much research and thanks for all your help and after reading this thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic7788.html?highlight=blanket I decided to order the NK blanket as a start.

I'll try that for a while and if necessary fit the fron NK kit and add 10mm in the rear from Acoustafoam as mentioned in AndrewS's post. the rationale being that the fron NK kit is already cut to all the correct shapes and the rear in comparision is easy 'flat bits'.

regards BM52
Post #94585 16th Oct 2011 8:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bm52



Member Since: 04 Apr 2010
Location: Kent
Posts: 2189

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Havana
coverd about 200 miles with the NK blanket on now and it has made quite a big difference, interestingly it seems to have moved the source of noise down towards the floor at speeds below 60 and at motorway speeds it seems very obvious that i now need to do the floor and seat box, plus the rear to reduce overall boom and road noise - can't hardly hear the engine now unless revved.

NK kit is on my Xmas pressy list now! BM52
Post #95724 23rd Oct 2011 9:48am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
rossy



Member Since: 29 Nov 2010
Location: Co. Roscommon
Posts: 1296

Ireland 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Stornoway Grey
BM52

what readings did you get from your decibel app? Most modern cars are around the 70 db mark and although the Defender is never ever going to be anywhere near that it would be interesting to know Question
Post #95810 23rd Oct 2011 8:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bm52



Member Since: 04 Apr 2010
Location: Kent
Posts: 2189

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Havana
before at 50 around 75-76db at 70 it was approx 79-80db
after the NK blanket at 50 around 73-74db at 70 about 78db.

quality of road surface made a difference and in Kent the roads are cr@p.


it will be interesting to see how much it goes down after the full NK kit. BM52
Post #95839 23rd Oct 2011 10:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MartinK



Member Since: 02 Mar 2011
Location: Silverdale (Lancashire/Cumbria Border)
Posts: 2664

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Orkney Grey
I just bought some 10mm thick soundproofing material off ebay.

Compared to the NoiseKiller stuff, this is really poor quality...more like a cheap foam sleeping mattress for camping, but twice the cost.

Already have NK in the rear tub, and also under bonnet, was buying a bit extra (for under the front mats, and under the front seats), and decided to try an alternative to NK (being a tight Yorkshireman living in Scotland, I wanted to try and save a few quid Wink ).

Looks like I'll be back to NK, although it's pricey, it's good stuff.

The NK in the rear tub made a big difference. One of my major noise sources was the rear wheelarches - especially on wet roads, or gravel tracks. The NK really fixed this! Defender "Puma" 2.4 110 County Utility (possibly the last of the 2.4's)
Post #95905 24th Oct 2011 10:15am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums