↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > INEOS Grenadier > VW may build 4x4...for £30,000
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
Print this entire topic · 
ChasingOurTrunks



Member Since: 19 Aug 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 89

I think that's part of my challenge Supacat - I'm working off academic numbers that I'm pulling from the web, not lived experience of actual use. But I can say that many of my friends in southern Ontario (Toronto area) have a commute that is 100+ kilometres each way, so just getting to and from work is 200 kms. Add on a hockey practice the next town over, a run out for groceries, etc and I can easily see the miles adding up. But that being said, my 70 KW/h battery example may be too extreme for sure. As I typed the above, I realize that still only represents 50% of the range of the Tesla which I think is about 500-600 kms.

However, even cutting my numbers in half (from 70 to 35), so that if a person is draining a Tesla 50% every day, that's still a need to produce 35 KW/hr per day which is still a number of panels beyond what my roof can fit. Again, it's a bit academic because the reality for most users is not black or white as they have solar supplemented with grid power.

But the original thing I was responding too -- the ease of dropping solar-powered charging stations in remote areas -- stands true. The math shows that BEVs need a significant number of panels to produce the KW/hrs to support use; it's not just a handful, but at least tens of panels to even charge a single car 50%. And in my math, I posited a single user's private charging system. That math increases a great deal if we're talking about a remote (i.e. not grid-supported) charging station relying totally on solar, being used by possibly more than one vehicle per day. This is why I think, given Ineos is aiming at remote area use a la Mining Companies, NGOs, and adventure travellers, that Ineos going electric in this day and age would be a mistake. Electric just isn't practical off-grid right now, unless it's being supplemented by traditional fossil fuels which kind of defeats the point. Hydrogen makes more sense as a hydrogen filling station can be done almost as easily as diesel.
Post #923943 1st Oct 2021 6:27pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums