↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Technical > MOT and emissions
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6264

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
so it would appear my emissions would easily pass the 2014 requirements let alone the two preceeding requirements Cool

Thumbs Up Mr. Green

would be interested to know what emissions are typical for 2.2 and pretty good in so much that if I'm not mistaken my 2.4 is the same as a 2007 2.4 so pretty damn good huh?
Post #748505 1st Jan 2019 5:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6264

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Just a thought on this and it only really relates to tdci models. I've not heard of anyone failing the emissions test - has anyone and what was the issue?

I presume none have been the result of a re-map?

Just curious if failing on emissions is something of a time gone-by ie mech pumps and carbs?
Post #751517 15th Jan 2019 8:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bongo1



Member Since: 02 Nov 2018
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 815

United Kingdom 
Caterham wrote:
/\ Very Happy

so went back to the MOT centre and asked for a print out of the emissions for interest and for your info should you wish to make comparisons.
I'd certainly be interested to know how it compares to others (but only if yours is higher / worse Mr. Green )

0.37 PPM which I believe is circa 25% of the max permissible of 1.5 PPM (?)

actually this is whats on the cert.
Test limit 1.50 l/m
absorption coefficient 0.38 l/m 2570 l/min zero drift 0.01 l/m
absorption coefficient after correction 0.37 l/m

Thumbs Up
Only got my defender 300tdi in OCT , But on the last MOT 17-2-18 Diesel Tune Analysis . Says smoke test , smoke reading reading 0.76 m1 max 1.50 , zero drift 0.02 0.10 max .

Goes in on thursday so will compare what that says , But no very good at 50% if yours is 25%
Post #751578 15th Jan 2019 11:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6264

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
I'd have thought that was pretty ok (but then what do I know). I'd have expected a tdci to be significantly better than a td5 and a td5 better than a tdi.

I my understanding is the evolution of these engines is largely driven to emissions. Thumbs Up
Post #751609 16th Jan 2019 8:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
yostumpy



Member Since: 01 Aug 2010
Location: n/kent
Posts: 327

That 1.5 is the fast pass limit, i.e. If it gets under that first go, then it'll pass. If it's above, then you have two more goes, and the average for the three, has to be below 3.0. ( because it's a turbo). ? Don't ask me why. 'Volvo XC 70, taking the rough with the smooth’
Post #751616 16th Jan 2019 9:11am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Retroanaconda



Member Since: 04 Jan 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2545

Scotland 
Failing emissions is down to either poor maintenance or a fault somewhere, not age or engine type.

Even my ancient Tdi with 346k on the clock passes first time, and has done every year for the ten MOTs I’ve put on it.
Post #751628 16th Jan 2019 10:03am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
smb



Member Since: 15 Jan 2013
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1232

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
^^^or maybe quality of fuel?
Last year reading at MOT time was 0.1. This time 0.51. However, this time I had just run through last ¾ tank of Diesel from Asda. Ran the tank to almost empty and filled up with BP Ultimate and after roughly ¾ tank went back to test emissions and it read 0.18. Maybe just coincidence, but I know next time hat I will be running before MOT.

That is with 170k on a 2.4tdci running a BAS remap with no egr, no cat and no middle silencer.
Post #751663 16th Jan 2019 12:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
smb



Member Since: 15 Jan 2013
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1232

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
^^^or maybe quality of fuel?
Last year reading at MOT time was 0.1. This time 0.51. However, this time I had just run through last ¾ tank of Diesel from Asda. Ran the tank to almost empty and filled up with BP Ultimate and after roughly ¾ tank went back to test emissions and it read 0.18. Maybe just coincidence, but I know next time what I will be running before MOT.

That is with 170k on a 2.4tdci running a BAS remap with no egr, no cat and no middle silencer.
Post #751664 16th Jan 2019 12:37pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mike c



Member Since: 11 Aug 2017
Location: Maldon, Essex
Posts: 904

England 2004 Defender 90 Td5 CSW Belize Green
It makes you wonder how strict they are, seems to a lot of stinking/smoking vans and diesel cars on the road that are within 10 years old....
Post #751686 16th Jan 2019 1:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bongo1



Member Since: 02 Nov 2018
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 815

United Kingdom 
Bongo1 wrote:
Caterham wrote:
/\ Very Happy

so went back to the MOT centre and asked for a print out of the emissions for interest and for your info should you wish to make comparisons.
I'd certainly be interested to know how it compares to others (but only if yours is higher / worse Mr. Green )

0.37 PPM which I believe is circa 25% of the max permissible of 1.5 PPM (?)

actually this is whats on the cert.
Test limit 1.50 l/m
absorption coefficient 0.38 l/m 2570 l/min zero drift 0.01 l/m
absorption coefficient after correction 0.37 l/m

Thumbs Up
Only got my defender 300tdi in OCT , But on the last MOT 17-2-18 Diesel Tune Analysis . Says smoke test , smoke reading 0.76 m1 max 1.50 , zero drift 0.02 0.10 max .

Goes in on thursday so will compare what that says , But no very good at 50% if yours is 25%
Well MOT pass today . Emissions were better than the last MOT as seen above . 0.47 and zero drift 0.00 .
Post #752032 18th Jan 2019 12:30am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bongo1



Member Since: 02 Nov 2018
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 815

United Kingdom 
John64 wrote:
There is a huge difference in emissions limits pre June 2008 and after June 2008.


Click image to enlarge

Is this current , mines a 1996 so it would be 3.0 , yet on the MOT it says 1.5 as the limit .
Post #752033 18th Jan 2019 12:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mo Murphy



Member Since: 01 Jun 2008
Location: Letchworth Garden City, Herts
Posts: 2077

United Kingdom 1984 Defender 90 200 Tdi HT Pennine Grey
My smoke test this week on my 200 Tdi yielded a score of 0.14. I'm quite happy with that.
Mo The Land Rover 90 - Many are called, few are chosen.
Post #752099 18th Jan 2019 1:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums