 | Home > Td5 > Does anyone have a photo of a genuine VDO MAF sensor ? |
 
|
|
|
| kevdonlon Member Since: 22 Jan 2013 Location: newcastle under lyme Posts: 12  |
mine was the same, no siemens/vdo stamp, looked to be blanked out but was in a genuine sealed box, works though, world of difference from the old one
|
||
18th Nov 2015 9:13pm |
|
| Crs90 Member Since: 08 Jul 2015 Location: In my excavator Posts: 82 
|
Thanks for the reply, just maybe a bit suspect as the original clear tape was cut and then sealed up with gaffer tape !
|
||
|
18th Nov 2015 9:31pm |
|
| RF3777 Member Since: 10 Apr 2015 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 144  
|
Check mine! I replace few months ago...
anyway the problem was not the MAF sensor... 
|
||
|
19th Nov 2015 9:53am |
|
| mturri Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: Patagonia Posts: 29  
|
See below photos of Genuine, OEM and Aftermarket MAFs.
Alas no picture from the underside of the OEM MAF, but from memory it looked the same as the Genuine though without the LR p/n inscription ('MHK100620'). Also note the Siemens/Continental VDO p/n printed on top of the sensor as well as the pin numbering on the connector. No p/n or pin numbering on the Aftermarket sensor. Both genuine and OEM have two filaments in the sensing element, the Aftermarket a resistor and a blank - this is allegedly what makes the pattern MAFs unreliable. Lastly the plastic injection of the Aftermarket unit is clearly of a lesser quality, at least cosmetically. Genuine: Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge OEM (Siemens/Continental VDO): Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Aftermarket: Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Hope this helps. |
||
|
22nd Nov 2015 5:10am |
|
| Crs90 Member Since: 08 Jul 2015 Location: In my excavator Posts: 82
|
Thanks for the replies, I'll get some pics up tomorrow night !
Chris. |
||
|
22nd Nov 2015 7:42pm |
|
| Peter Td4 Member Since: 23 Oct 2010 Location: Antwerp, Belgium Posts: 227  
|
It certainly does  Peter,
Defender 110 StaWa - Td5 Defender 110 HCPU - Puma Defender 90 Soft Top - Td5 |
||
|
23rd Nov 2015 9:44am |
|
| Crs90 Member Since: 08 Jul 2015 Location: In my excavator Posts: 82
|
Photos as promised of the original and the other "genuine VDO" item,
does it look ok to people on here ? Click image to enlarge Chris. Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge |
||
|
24th Nov 2015 9:28pm |
|
| srod Member Since: 20 Mar 2015 Location: Argyll Posts: 190 |
That is exactly what I had - for both the old and the new part. Appears to be much the same, but with logo etched out. Spoke to the place I got it from, can't remember the exact reason I was given, but I was satisfied with it.
Anyway, I installed the new part, and going for a drive with a Nanocom connected, the MAF values are in the range expected (as opposed to before when they were something close to zero and unchanging, this was with the old sensor connected, and with no sensor connected). Made no noticeable difference to running of car though  |
||
|
25th Nov 2015 12:56am |
|
| roel Member Since: 08 Aug 2009 Location: Lelystad Posts: 2039  
|
Does the Britpart have a resistor instead off a film? I think I have a broken one like that and have a proper one now.
 Roel
1984 90 2.5 na Diesel - RR V8 (1994-2001) 1997 Camel Trophy Discovery 300TDI (2001-2009) 2005 G4 Discovery III 4.4 V8 (2008-2018) It's gone but it still hurts. 2003 90 Td5 (2009-now) |
||
|
25th Nov 2015 9:21am |
|
| achuakh Member Since: 12 Apr 2012 Location: Singapore Posts: 157  
|
I've got both.
Yes the britpart one has a resistor instead of a film. both seems to work ok. i've ran the britpart one for over 5yrs and have switched over to the VDO one a few weeks back. From the land of the most expensive land rover defenders on planet earth. At �125k for a XS 110 csw and you get to own it only for 10yrs! Please find me a good reason to stay on this island. |
||
|
30th Nov 2015 4:12am |
|
| souster4 Member Since: 11 May 2014 Location: West midlands Posts: 153 
|
Sorry to dig this old thread up. But it doesn't seem worth making another one.
Does anyone know if genuine land rover maf sensors always have brand markings on them? The one im looking into which is apparently genuine, has no markings on it at all. For a TD5. Thanks |
||
|
1st Feb 2021 6:24pm |
|
| landy andy Member Since: 15 Feb 2009 Location: Ware, Herts Posts: 5422 
|
I don’t think they come with anything on them other than a digital print of part no. on the top of the sensor. The VDO one’s don’t I fitted one yesterday
|
||
|
1st Feb 2021 10:21pm |
|
| souster4 Member Since: 11 May 2014 Location: West midlands Posts: 153
|
Thanks landy andy .
Do you mean like this? Click image to enlarge |
||
|
1st Feb 2021 10:57pm |
|
| landy andy Member Since: 15 Feb 2009 Location: Ware, Herts Posts: 5422
|
No not like that. That looks dodgy to me.
Will get you a photo tomorrow |
||
|
2nd Feb 2021 12:29am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
