↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > TDCi 2.2 Fuel useage?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
Print this entire topic · 
LR90XS2011



Member Since: 05 Apr 2011
Location: bickenhill
Posts: 3612

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Galway Green
Zed wrote:
Caterham wrote:
oh oh ... ask me, ask me Very Happy

over 600 miles on a standard 110 tank - 40 mpg.

BUT - that's taking it proper steady.

I work on - anything over 500 miles happy,
anything less than 500 miles - not so happy.


Assuming you have a standard 60 litre tank:

600 miles = 45 mpg

Absolutely incredible. Magical even.


I was intrigued by Caterham's MPG figures on previous posts and also have an 11 reg 2.4 , I have a scan gauge and have checked it against recorded data and its reasonably close.

If I try really hard, coast to junctions read the road, feather the throttle and use no more than 1750 rpm in any gear on clear roads I can achieve really good figures in the low 40s, generally however I achieve a lot less, speed and revs kill good mpg in a 2.4 DEFENDER 90 TDCI XS,

I hope everyone is well and your land rovers make you happy
Post #810449 15th Jan 2020 9:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6264

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
you've got me thinking now. I'll have to dig out the photos of the receipt and check but pretty sure the number above are what I recorded........
good to see another 2.4 achieving 40mpg (+ because it's a 90 and lighter Mr. Green Thumbs Up )

- in other words what I'm saying is you're not as economical cos you'd expect better being a 90 Rolling with laughter Mr. Green Thumbs Up
Post #810453 15th Jan 2020 9:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6264

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
hmmm.
only evidence I can find is for 38.6 mpg. which was 71.94 ltrs over 611.9 miles.

I'm sure however one of my tanks did 616 miles and the litres (whatever they were) worked out to be 40mpg.
....I'll keep looking Mr. Green
Post #810457 15th Jan 2020 9:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 421

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
The older my 110 2.2 is the less fuel it consumes.

1L less after 7 years.

Let's wait another 63 years and it's going to be a zero emission vehicle Thumbs Up
Post #810473 15th Jan 2020 11:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LR90XS2011



Member Since: 05 Apr 2011
Location: bickenhill
Posts: 3612

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Galway Green
Caterham wrote:
you've got me thinking now. I'll have to dig out the photos of the receipt and check but pretty sure the number above are what I recorded........
good to see another 2.4 achieving 40mpg (+ because it's a 90 and lighter Mr. Green Thumbs Up )

- in other words what I'm saying is you're not as economical cos you'd expect better being a 90 Rolling with laughter Mr. Green Thumbs Up


Hi Wayne next time I have longish trip without the Caravan I will brim the 90 and try really hard then use hard data to calculate a figure and see how that compares with the scan gauge. DEFENDER 90 TDCI XS,

I hope everyone is well and your land rovers make you happy
Post #810484 16th Jan 2020 7:57am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
notxal



Member Since: 20 Nov 2019
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 89

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Aintree Green
90 Hardtop - Puma 2.2L with BAS drivability 150BHP remap.

Best mpg was a steady 90 mile country road and dual carriageway run which returned 35.66 mpg. Overall average mpg with town, local roads and a bit of off road is around 31mpg. Calculated using the excellent ROAD TRIP App.



Click image to enlarge
Post #810491 16th Jan 2020 8:46am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
nicam



Member Since: 14 Dec 2007
Location: deepest Lancashire
Posts: 156

2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Aintree Green
Like some others I always record mileage and litres at each fill so as to claim the money back and get the VAT.
In my 2015 2.2 110 I get 28 to 30 mpg on the normal A road / motorway commute. 2 or 3 less if I use the motorway more, as may be expected.
But I always keep an eye on the fuel gauge and reckon on 150 miles by 3/4 on the gauge; 250 miles at 1/2; 350miles by 1/4 and the light on and bong at 410miles. It will then take 65 litres to fill. Another 25 miles and I get the "Misfire".
NB. I have put 75 litres in once when I pushed it a bit to get back to my normal filling station. Whistle
Now you`ll all be watching the gauge and comparing with the miles travelled Rolling Eyes
The only time this has actually been useful was when an injector started "hosing" and fuel consumption plummeted - it was the mileage after half a tank had gone that alerted me to the problem. Don`t drive faster than your angel can fly!
Post #810545 16th Jan 2020 3:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
andydef90



Member Since: 09 Feb 2015
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 617

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
I get between 28 and 30 on a motorway run at about 65 mph and about 19 around town that's without a load when loaded it drops to about 20 mpg . I try not to watch the cost too much Smile
Post #810547 16th Jan 2020 3:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6264

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
I remembered one of my old posts '600 IS possible'

below is from that which gives the 40mpg Mr. Green

Max range on a tank 618.3 miles
And Max size fill up of 70.02 ltrs

Thumbs Up

I can longer remember the details but would assume that the vast majority of those 618 miles was on the motorway at about 52 mph Thumbs Up
Post #810614 16th Jan 2020 10:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums