↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > SVX lamps?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
eutek



Member Since: 03 Mar 2009
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 586

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
SVX lamps?
Hi all... is the SVX headlamp swap a straight-up swap, or is it more complicated than that, ie wiring etc?
Post #61275 27th Feb 2011 1:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
XS Pete



Member Since: 13 Jan 2011
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 632

England 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Mechanically yes, I think they're pretty much a straight swap but electrically no. The SVX crystal headlamps contain the sidelights whereas the originals do not so there are some wiring changes required.

Also, if you're going for the complete SVX set up, you get driving lamps too which come on with your main beam. To sort this out (and the sidelights) the kit comes with an additional wiring harness and relay to make the necessary connections.

Pete
Post #61406 28th Feb 2011 11:57am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
eutek



Member Since: 03 Mar 2009
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 586

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Thanks for that.

I'm actually just looking to improve the main beams - but the whole setup is intriguing.
Post #61410 28th Feb 2011 12:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mrandmrsh



Member Since: 31 May 2010
Location: Huddersfield
Posts: 692

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Santorini Black
I have got a bit confused looking at the prices.

The RHD with h/l adjustment is VPLDV000 and RRP is £408 but do I also need the grill as a separate? It seems strange that the lights and gubbins is £408 and the grill (moulding kit) LR008361 is over £500. So for the fancy lights and grill it is going to be over £1000 fitted. Has anyone who has done this found decent sources?

Regards
Craig
Post #61413 28th Feb 2011 12:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
XS Pete



Member Since: 13 Jan 2011
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 632

England 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Yes, you do need the grille kit, which comes as three parts (the centre and the two headlamp surrounds). You also need the wiring kit and fixing kit, and the prices for all of these in the brochure are plus fitting.

There's a guy on eBay here:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Land-Rover-Defender-...3f072b97a5

doing the whole lot for £1120 ish plus delivery. Obviously, then you've got to fit it yourself. In the advert, he lists all the part numbers for all of the bits you need which is useful for research purposes.

I ordered my kit to be fitted to my new Defender by the local dealer before I took delivery of the car. It worked out quite a lot cheaper that way.

Pete
Post #61435 28th Feb 2011 4:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
And when you have spent over £1500 you will have one ugly car Laughing Embarassed Mike
Post #61440 28th Feb 2011 4:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RED-DOT



Member Since: 29 Jun 2009
Location: stirling
Posts: 2363

Scotland 
I 100% agree and have no aspirations to imitate a gullable purchacer of an inferior car... buy a good XS spec 90 or 110 and make it your own spec.... 2008 RS4 gone, 123d M Sport, and a Puma 90 XS..
Post #61447 28th Feb 2011 4:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mrandmrsh



Member Since: 31 May 2010
Location: Huddersfield
Posts: 692

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Santorini Black
Each to their own, I think on some colours the SVX front looks ok and there is a functional benefit as the standard lights are Censored . However, my pockets don't quite run that deep....
Post #61451 28th Feb 2011 4:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
mrandmrsh wrote:
Each to their own, I think on some colours the SVX front looks ok and there is a functional benefit as the standard lights are Censored . However, my pockets don't quite run that deep....


I suppose black at night, would be an improvement Rolling with laughter

On main beam standard isnt that bad - but for about £50 get wipac clear lights and uprate the bulbs (plus keep the headlamps clean) if your desperate Mike
Post #61464 28th Feb 2011 6:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
XS Pete



Member Since: 13 Jan 2011
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 632

England 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Quote:
And when you have spent over £1500 you will have one ugly car


You really don't like the SVX front do you? I've only been a member here since the end of last year, but that's at least the third time I've seen you air that opinion. Some people (me included) really do like it and the lights are a massive improvement over the candles of the standard setup, especially on main beam.

Explains your post count I suppose.

Pete
Post #61476 28th Feb 2011 7:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
XS Pete wrote:
Quote:
And when you have spent over £1500 you will have one ugly car


You really don't like the SVX front do you? I've only been a member here since the end of last year, but that's at least the third time I've seen you air that opinion. Some people (me included) really do like it and the lights are a massive improvement over the candles of the standard setup, especially on main beam.

Explains your post count I suppose.

Pete


I suppose the post count has something to do with being a member before the svx was thought up... Thumbs Up

but no, the svx front end is awful and it will be so until the scrap it...i grant there are a few people who believe it either looks nice or is better...but then there are people with more money than sense too.

I would add the old range rover sport body kit was bad too...but then they sell more and make more money to face lift it.

Trust me - ive passed my thoughts on direct to the designers Whistle but there are reasons for everything Sheep Mike
Post #61523 28th Feb 2011 9:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
lrdxb110



Member Since: 09 Jul 2009
Location: Dubai
Posts: 224

United Arab Emirates 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Stornoway Grey
Personally I don't like the svx front too, just earlier today saw td5 being fitted with a svx front at the dealers, it just look horrible Rolling with laughter

I don't even like the HST kit on the range rover sport, its just wrong! Whistle

If you want decent lighting why don't you go for these - http://www.mobilecentre.co.uk/led-land-rov...p-450.html '08 LR Defender 110
'08 Mini Cooper S - Sidewalk
'86 MB 500 SL
'79 MB 450SEL 6.9
Post #61527 28th Feb 2011 9:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
kingofthesparks



Member Since: 06 Jan 2011
Location: Very close to Watford gap services , northants
Posts: 987

United Kingdom 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Fuji White
just looked at that svx light and grille set up and threw up all over my keyboard Sad
would not have it even if they paid me £1500
Post #61528 28th Feb 2011 9:59pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CR



Member Since: 28 Jan 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 947

Ireland 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Santorini Black
I for one like the svx front as I have it on an svx and will be getting it coloured coded
on my new 110. The bottom line on it is that the lights are a huge improvement
over the standard candles.

I also find it funny when I read "more money than sense" what does this mean ?
Is it because someone has money they have none or does it mean you have no money or
is it just an insult to anyone who has different taste to you ?
Post #61530 28th Feb 2011 10:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jerseyman



Member Since: 21 Jul 2009
Location: Jersey
Posts: 279

mse wrote:


but no, the svx front end is awful and it will be so until the scrap it...i grant there are a few people who believe it either looks nice or is better...but then there are people with more money than sense too.

:


Every SVX owner has more money than sense? Well that has alienated a lot of enthusiastic Landie owners. A variation of anyone who does not drive a Leafer is a softie I suppose.

A few IMHOs would change your post from a rant into a perfectly valid opinion.

But tell me if the SVX front end raises such contempt, why are you reading this thread?
Post #61541 28th Feb 2011 10:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums