↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Brake Pressure Valve - Don’t have one, why?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5765

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
Brake Pressure Valve - Don’t have one, why?
Evening all.

As per the subject, I’m in the process of replacing and/or upgrading braking parts on the DC. As a reminder I have a non-ABS MY2011 2.4 DCPU with vented discs.

It seems during my investigation that I have no Brake Pressure Valve. I’ve read up on what they’re for (prevent front wheels locking up), so I’m wondering:

A. Should I have one?
B. If not, why not?
C. If not, should I upgrade to one? (I’m doing new pipes, braided hoses, LOF Powerspec, and possibly new calipers with SS pistons). Would this be a worthwhile addition?

Just wondering? Thumbs Up Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #938203 18th Jan 2022 6:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mikeh501



Member Since: 07 Jan 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1142

United Kingdom 
I thought the valve was to prevent the rear locking up. I don’t know about pumas but you definitely need one on the older stuff. Possible it happens in the master on a puma?
Post #938208 18th Jan 2022 6:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5765

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
Mmm? No idea. I’ve been liaising with Matchap from the forum who is also doing his pipes. He also has a 2.4, albeit a 90, and has the valve. Maybe 90s have them because they’re lighter and a 110’s mass will prevent lock up? Massive hypothesising there…. Whistle Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #938211 18th Jan 2022 6:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dailysleaze



Member Since: 23 May 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 237

United Kingdom 
It's for the rear locking up on 90s and pickups that are lighter at the back
Post #938213 18th Jan 2022 6:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4405

United Kingdom 
Hi Grenadier.

I have also done the exact same research and found that initially these were fitted the the early 90s and 110s to reduce the pressure going to the rear drum brakes to prevent their cylinder popping seals. When the Defender added disc brakes to the rear axle the valve was retained to reduce the risk of the rear wheels locking up. The valve was supposedly left off vehicles around 2002-2003 when the P38 axle was introduced and the proportioning of braking pressure was dealt with inside the master cylinder. With respects to that when depressing the brake the MC engages the rear brakes before the front brakes to prevent front end lock up's.

So, Miffy being a 2003 shouldn't have a remote brake pressure valve, but she does Rolling Eyes Also a vented, non-ABS Defender 110.

In the long run what this means is that if your MOT guy (or French equivalent) says that your rear brakes are under braking and as long as your callipers, pads and discs are in good nick, then your MC is probably by-passing fluid across the internal seals.

As well as the pipes you already know are sitting in my shed ready to go on Miffy, there is also a new MC and servo. Both of these are originals in the vehicle (222k miles) and looking their age.
Post #938225 18th Jan 2022 8:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Leamreject



Member Since: 19 Dec 2020
Location: Middle Earth - Leamington Spa
Posts: 955

Italy 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Fuji White
Yes they prevent rear lock up and normally fitted to vans so active at different levels if load or not.

Simply you don’t want rear lock up if your empty so the laden valve reduces rear brake performance Ride like you stole it!!
If I’m not on a bike it’s because only a 4x4 will do…
2011 2.4 Puma 90 HT
Post #938226 18th Jan 2022 9:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3209

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
The early 90s had what was called a G Valve, part number NRC 8215.
I have just opened one, just to check and clean... cannot fully disassemble, as internally seems like it has been press fitted. But I could feel that internally there is just a ball or plunger, not spring loaded. It looks like that in the event of high flow rate, or perhaps high G force, possibly even high gradient, the valve would shut off the pressure to the rear brakes. The installation angle is important for those G valves. 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #938229 18th Jan 2022 9:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4405

United Kingdom 
That is a good point there are two versions of an in-line valve in the braking system. The brake pressure valve (aka brake proportioning valve) and the "G-valve". The first is not effected by cargo weight, angle or change in momentum, the latter is. I believe the former superseded the latter but at what VIN I do not know. Could be the point at which disc brakes were standard on the rear. The former is also mounted perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle and the latter I believe is mounted in-line with the longitudinal axis of the vehicle and direction of momentum.

From my research I believe this is true, does anyone else know any different!?
Post #938238 18th Jan 2022 10:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
landy andy



Member Since: 15 Feb 2009
Location: Ware, Herts
Posts: 5422

2006 Defender 110 Td5 USW Zermatt Silver
I thought the later was auto adjusted by the pressure that was provided by the pedal, hence being plumbed into the front brake line, to adjust pressure to the rear.
Post #938239 18th Jan 2022 10:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums