 | Home > Puma (Tdci) > 110 DCPU 2nd row legroom |
 
|
|
|
...a trip of 1500km in the back is realy no fun...
| LandRoverAnorak Member Since: 17 Jul 2011 Location: Surrey Posts: 11240   
|
I can't really help with your first three questions, but can confirm that a 130 is exactly the same as a 110. The extra length is behind the cab. Darren
110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak "You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia |
||
12th Sep 2013 2:42pm |
|
| Regard Member Since: 08 Dec 2011 Location: RSA Posts: 251  
|
110 DCPU = 110 SW = 130 HCPU. The deffirence in these models is what happens behind the 2nd row seats.
IIRC there was some one who moved the seat a few inches backwards but that required cutting in to the body and welding new pieces in etc, etc..... BTW.....how big is your kid? We are not exactely small folk down here in Africa most of our kids do just fine in the back? |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:08pm |
|
| blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 16982 
|
The 110 and 130 double cabs have less 2nd row legroom than and 110 SW models, by something like 2 to 3 inches. The reason is that the rear panel of the cab prevents the seats being as far back, and the seat backs are also more upright.
The only person I have yet heard of who has managed to come up with an effective solution to this is AndrewS who took the rear of the cab out of his 130 DC HCPU "J-Lo" and combined the cab and rear load space, making a sort of "super-USW" (and very nice it is too). This is not practical for most of us though. Sadly I don't really think there is any effectice solution (besides amputation) for this, unless you can find a replacement seat with a very thin backrest. Even that will make so little difference that it might not really be worth the effort. |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:18pm |
|
| Go Beyond Member Since: 30 Jan 2012 Location: Headcorn, Kent Posts: 6676
|
As Blackwolf says, the 110 DCPU and 130 HCPU are the same in terms of leg room but Regard is wrong that they are the same as the 110 SW / CSW / USW (again as Blackwolf has already said)
|
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:26pm |
|
| Regard Member Since: 08 Dec 2011 Location: RSA Posts: 251
|
Ok.....
Thought they are all the same. But I guess 2 inch (that is what?.....4cm and a bit in proper terms  ). Shees that, in my books, is almost the same Last edited by Regard on 12th Sep 2013 3:41pm. Edited 1 time in total |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:37pm |
|
| Go Beyond Member Since: 30 Jan 2012 Location: Headcorn, Kent Posts: 6676
|
I found out when I bought a 110 CSW rear rubber mat for my 130
 |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:39pm |
|
| blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 16982
|
Two inches is 50.8mm in the new useless Europiffle measurements!
 |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:39pm |
|
| Go Beyond Member Since: 30 Jan 2012 Location: Headcorn, Kent Posts: 6676
|
I think it is more than 2" (50.8mm) anyway ...
|
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:40pm |
|
| Regard Member Since: 08 Dec 2011 Location: RSA Posts: 251
|
So the 110 SW mat wont fit your 130? |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:41pm |
|
| Go Beyond Member Since: 30 Jan 2012 Location: Headcorn, Kent Posts: 6676
|
No, its much too wide (front to back) by over 2" I would guess
|
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:41pm |
|
| blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 16982
|
I think it's nearer three inches (or 76.2mm for youngsters) but can't remember the exact figure.
|
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:47pm |
|
| pjb Member Since: 08 Apr 2009 Location: Sunny Oxford Posts: 1244 |
Back to OP can you not remove the seat back & secure the car seat to back of the double cab so you gain the seat back depth
 2020 P300 HSE |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 3:59pm |
|
| sparkylee Member Since: 06 Nov 2010 Location: surrey Posts: 1455 
|
What about fitting child seat in the middle of the second row so he can put feet up on top of cubby box ?
 It's good to be back from the dark side
DC110 -2012 Black with black hood and black x-tech FFRR 4.2 vogue Renault traffic auto PT crusier convertible Laika x700 Motorhome |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 4:08pm |
|
| sparkylee Member Since: 06 Nov 2010 Location: surrey Posts: 1455
|
Also if you unbolt the rear backs from there brackets this allows the backs to fold flat not sure if it allows them to recline a bit but if you removed the brackets out the way it may allow them back a bit It's good to be back from the dark side
DC110 -2012 Black with black hood and black x-tech FFRR 4.2 vogue Renault traffic auto PT crusier convertible Laika x700 Motorhome |
||
|
12th Sep 2013 4:19pm |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
