 | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Puma Air Filters? |
 
|
|
|
| RED-DOT Member Since: 29 Jun 2009 Location: stirling Posts: 2363  
|
I fitted K&N for years and if overoiled ruin the MAFF sensor at £70 a pop and noticed no difference to performance or economy. I fitted an ITG to my Puma and took it out after a month when i read that the standard filter can cope with demands of ten times the airflow required so i went back to standard. 2008 RS4 gone, 123d M Sport, and a Puma 90 XS..
|
||
29th Feb 2012 11:38am |
|
| K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610  
|
http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic10760.html?highlight=itg
http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic3573.html?highlight=itg If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
|
29th Feb 2012 11:39am |
|
| Tim_NZ Member Since: 05 May 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 177 
|
One of the AULRO members did a test on standard LR filters, (300TDi and V8 ), vs K&N filters a few years ago, whilst the flow rates were good for the K&N it's ability to filter dust were not so great.
http://www.aulro.com/afvb/technical-chatte...nally.html Cheers, Tim |
||
|
29th Feb 2012 1:38pm |
|
| Dave-H Member Since: 08 Feb 2011 Location: Surrey Posts: 1507  
|
Any change a 'performance' air filter makes to mpg and power is so negligible that you won't notice any difference in real world terms.
Some think its quicker simply because induction noise increase fools them into believing so. It's really down to personal choice, i have one in mine [Pipercross] but simply so i can just whip it out, wash it off and refit. Guns and Landrovers .... anything else is irrelevant. |
||
|
29th Feb 2012 4:05pm |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
