↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Wheels & Tyres > Tyre pressures
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
steveww



Member Since: 05 Jan 2022
Location: Uppingham
Posts: 529

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Bronze Green
Tyre pressures
I recently purchased a 2015 Defender 110 CSW. One of the previous owners fitted 18" wheels.

The tyres are 265/65R18. What are the recommended pressures for front and rear?
Post #937229 11th Jan 2022 4:50pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MatLandy



Member Since: 11 Sep 2020
Location: Paris
Posts: 176

France 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Zermatt Silver
I believe the wheel diameter, 16s or 18s, does not have much influence here. Your tyres are 265/65r18 and are of the same diameter as original 235/85r16 tyres fitted by LR. However the width is different (you have wider tyres).

The way I always understood it, is that it is the contact surface between the tyre and the road that is important - to keep vehicle handling, braking, as well as tyre wear within manufacturer's specs.
This is why we put more air in our tyres (increase pressure) when laden, avoiding the tyres to flatten out on the road, and counter the effect of the additional weight.

So to keep the contact surface the same, I would say the wider the tyres, the lower the pressure required.

I do have a Puma CSW 110 with 265/65r18 (Pirelli Scorpion AT Plus) and run 2.1bar (front) / 2.5bar (rear) when unladen and commuting in the suburbs where I live. This gives me a reasonably comfortable ride for everyday use. I have always found, at least for the rear of a 110, that the recommended tyre pressure from LR gives a very harsh and bouncy ride, and that cannot be good in the long run both for my back and the landy. When going for long distance trips on motorway, loaded with 4 persons + luggage + gears, I increase the rear pressure accordingly at least to 2.8bar and ideally to 3.0bar until I reach my destination point and then re-adjust to the intended use (usually lowering a bit).

/Mat
Post #938049 17th Jan 2022 1:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
steveww



Member Since: 05 Jan 2022
Location: Uppingham
Posts: 529

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Bronze Green
Thanks for the info. You run the rear a bit higher that what I use at the moment. I'll try you setting and see how it goes.
Post #938052 17th Jan 2022 1:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jpboost



Member Since: 13 Apr 2021
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 374

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
I certainly agree with Mat that the LR spec for 110 rears is rather uncomfortable when unladen.

I run mine around 35-40 psi depending on load, so a similar ballpark to those shared above.
Post #938055 17th Jan 2022 2:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bluest



Member Since: 23 Apr 2016
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3995

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
I've often wondered why the 110 rear unladen pressure is so high. It must have been chosen for a reason and I would imagine car makers spend quite a bit of time arriving at tyre pressures. The only thing I can come up with is that it may be a way to help prevent a rollover in an emergency swerve. The tyre being more likely to slide rather than grip and tuck under. Just a guess though. I was thinking back to the problems Ford had with Explorer which, if I recall, was at least partly due to running light truck tyres at too low a pressure for ride comfort reasons. 2007 110 TDCi Station Wagon XS
Post #938058 17th Jan 2022 3:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
htb2



Member Since: 02 Nov 2018
Location: aberdeenshire
Posts: 509

Scotland 
Also higher at rear to allow for towing, quite a considerable weight transfer on trailer over-run brakes when running at 3.5t+ trailer weight, when you hit the brake pedal before trailer brakes come on.
Post #938071 17th Jan 2022 5:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bluest



Member Since: 23 Apr 2016
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3995

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
It could be that, but there is a separate, higher setting for towing and fully laden. Maybe they just assume folk will be too lazy to do that so have a very high standard pressure. 2007 110 TDCi Station Wagon XS
Post #938075 17th Jan 2022 6:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
htb2



Member Since: 02 Nov 2018
Location: aberdeenshire
Posts: 509

Scotland 
Covers both bases I suppose, I run at 40-45 psi rear, can be a bit harsh when unladen, tried it at lower pressures with the trailer but I got a lot of rear tyre cracking, Trailer unloaded is probably 900-950 kg, Laden anyones guess, stop loading when down to 1" clearance between bump stops and chassis. Difficult to know weight when chipping into it heavier when raining and then how much does timber weigh.
Trailer pressures are at 80-85psi, recommended 90psi, if run at the higher pressure appear to get more tyre damage and blow outs.
Post #938079 17th Jan 2022 6:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Race.it



Member Since: 27 Aug 2019
Location: Algeciras
Posts: 741

Spain 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Alaska White
If this helps.


Click image to enlarge
 Searching for my first Defender...and started just as Covid hit, so talk about timing.

5 months after starting the search I found it, and here is the details
Post #938138 18th Jan 2022 11:04am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MatLandy



Member Since: 11 Sep 2020
Location: Paris
Posts: 176

France 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Zermatt Silver
Interesting chart, although I would be interested to know where it comes from?

I find the figures stated for a 90 a bit unusual ... rear tyres with lower pressure than the front ?
That would be the first time I see that. But then again I haven't seen everything yet Rolling Eyes

/Mat
Post #938163 18th Jan 2022 1:59pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Race.it



Member Since: 27 Aug 2019
Location: Algeciras
Posts: 741

Spain 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Alaska White
I got told it was from the works cars that had the 18” rims and the v8 engine. That could also change the weight distribution so these maybe not valid for a diesel. Searching for my first Defender...and started just as Covid hit, so talk about timing.

5 months after starting the search I found it, and here is the details
Post #938165 18th Jan 2022 2:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Leamreject



Member Since: 19 Dec 2020
Location: Middle Earth - Leamington Spa
Posts: 954

Italy 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Fuji White
I always run unladen road use so only inflate to 30psi max. Even at 30 it’s a firm ride.. Ride like you stole it!!
If I’m not on a bike it’s because only a 4x4 will do…
2011 2.4 Puma 90 HT
Post #938172 18th Jan 2022 2:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums