↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Spotted > Giving Defenders a bad name...
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 4 of 4 <1234
Print this entire topic · 
nosnibod



Member Since: 15 Aug 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 365

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Corris Grey
A UK view is somewhat different.


Click image to enlarge
 Dave
Gracie - 2015 110 XS County Station Wagon
Post #880086 22nd Jan 2021 10:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
You may be right but I'm not sure that graphic demonstrates it - there's no indication of fault attributation.

Can you post a link to the source?
Post #880088 22nd Jan 2021 11:01am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dixy



Member Since: 30 Nov 2020
Location: Somerset
Posts: 42

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 2.5 TD CSW Cairns Blue
I was recently involved with the submissions to the select committee looking at reviewing young driver education. The problem is legislation is cheap where as education is expensive.
The most common question asked of an ADI is how cheaply can you get my kid through their test. By the time someone is learning to drive they purely want freedom, they are interested in getting in to uni or work or getting to friends or into friends underwear.
Learning to operate a dangerous piece of equipment is just a necessary hassle. It is also not helped that the examiner says I am pleased to inform you that you have passed rather than I am willing to allow you to continue learning to drive unaccompanied.
Post #880091 22nd Jan 2021 11:15am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
nosnibod



Member Since: 15 Aug 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 365

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Corris Grey
Surrey police posted the graphic via their social media, for example:-

https://twitter.com/surreyroadcops/status/1328340538832121858

The source of the data appears to be from government statistics gathered together here:-

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/g...s-2019.pdf

The statistics are gathered from a variety of sources, police and hospitals, but no indication of ‘cause’ or ‘blame’ is made.

In terms of training or educations of all road users, then we all owe it to each other to make sure that we are equipped with the skills and attitude necessary to complete a journey without causing harm to others.

When I hear or read posts of people saying that other road users shouldn’t be on the road, or should get out of the way, all that says to me is that the individual saying or posting that does not have the right attitude to be a careful and competent road user. Dave
Gracie - 2015 110 XS County Station Wagon
Post #880092 22nd Jan 2021 11:20am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Thumbs Up

I'll stand corrected but it appears a mis-use of the data then if the Roads Policing Unit tweets this with that graphic:

"We often focus our enforcement efforts against those who do most harm to vulnerable road users.
This chart shows why a lot of that effort is directed at car drivers."

I wonder if the copper also talks to bridge owners about the number of people jumping off them or should that be people owning the ground on which they land?
Post #880104 22nd Jan 2021 12:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
nosnibod



Member Since: 15 Aug 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 365

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Corris Grey
Given the Roads Policing Unit remit, I suspect they mean "We often focus our enforcement efforts against those road users who do most harm to vulnerable road users." Dave
Gracie - 2015 110 XS County Station Wagon
Post #880129 22nd Jan 2021 1:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 4 of 4 <1234
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums