 | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Double cardan propshafts |
 
|
|
|
| jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 7683  
|
I understand the mechanics of it blackwolf, I believe for the ops stated use on std vehicle it's not required. There is no mention of vibration being an issue, just a worn uj. Lr thought it ok in their wisdom and there are thousands out there with no issues. Yes it can be improved, and yes it's not engr brilliant, but it works for 99% of people 99% of the time. So save the money.
A lifted vehicle greater than 35mm on a puma, yes I see that now as a requirement, for a puma. Cheers James 110 XS Utility 130 Puma Station wagon/camper (in the making) 90 Puma Hardtop |
||
4th Dec 2019 8:10am |
|
| blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 16868  
|
Agree, the OP would see "little benefit".
|
||
|
4th Dec 2019 8:30am |
|
| custom90 Member Since: 21 Jan 2010 Location: South West, England. Posts: 19560
|
The only downside I can see is the cost.
I presume the UJ’s the same to remove / replace or possibly easier? I know the size of the UJ cups is different to factory. The factory props are a pain in the backside to do. But mine are perfect now with the GKN UJ’s. Is there a reason why the driveline angle is the way it is on the Puma it was it just the engine and gearbox type that was built in such a way that it fitting in that way. LR must have thought it was in tolerance levels that were acceptable. Diesel$ Live$ Matter. ⛽️🛢️👨🔧🧰⚙️ RED, WHITE & BOOST! 🇬🇧 |
||
|
4th Dec 2019 12:02pm |
|
| Supacat Member Since: 16 Oct 2012 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 11018 
|
I really was with you until you mentioned this... Engineering wisdom appears to have played second or even third fiddle behind the design and finance teams on the Defender for many a moon.
For what though? I'm guessing many on here have spent far too much money on a single "upgrade" if you try and quantify it in terms of some sort of objective economic payback. Sometimes it's worth it just knowing it's there and being able to appreciate the intrinsic engineering behind the part. |
||
|
5th Dec 2019 7:51am |
|
| Noiseydave Member Since: 27 Dec 2015 Location: West Midlands Posts: 43 
|
I have a QT Services one on the front of a 110, it does make a difference in terms vibration and the drive train is smoother. Would i buy one again, well as the original prop had worn a flange i thought i would try 'an upgrade' and I would do so again.
|
||
|
5th Dec 2019 2:49pm |
|
| Naks Member Since: 27 Jan 2009 Location: Stellenbosch, ZA Posts: 2588  
|
Any recommendations for wide angle props for a 90? thanks --
2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear 2015 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged 
Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9 Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ |
||
|
20th Sep 2020 10:20am |
|
| jaygti Member Since: 04 Nov 2012 Location: essex Posts: 375 
|
I have the gywn Lewis ones on mine and they’ve been fine.
I have a 2inch lift and I was always changing u/js The u/js have lasted well, but that might be because I grease them 3 or 4 times a year now. No vibrations at all. Click image to enlarge 2002 td5 90 county hardtop |
||
|
20th Sep 2020 11:24am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
