 | Home > Wheels & Tyres > kM2 V STT |
 
|
|
|
| BIGFOG Member Since: 12 Sep 2010 Location: Edenbridge Posts: 537   
|
That's a fair 2p... Ideally I'd have a set of each. But may not be able to justify that straight away, so in the mean time it's down to to a toss up between needs and wants!?
|
||
19th Jun 2011 11:00pm |
|
| bm52 Member Since: 04 Apr 2010 Location: Kent Posts: 2189 
|
ha..that old dilema! if you roll in 'man maths' you are bound to get the right answer but maybe not the sensible one.
good luck with the mental ping-pong  BM52 |
||
|
19th Jun 2011 11:04pm |
|
| BIGFOG Member Since: 12 Sep 2010 Location: Edenbridge Posts: 537
|
You mean "Why spend £5.00 when you could spend £10.00", it's a family motto!!
|
||
|
19th Jun 2011 11:07pm |
|
| willy eckerslike Member Since: 15 Jun 2009 Location: North yorks Posts: 1789 
|
Big Fog, if you can't afford / justify both KM2's and AT's then go for the AT's. I have run my KM2's on many a long trip and whilst they are not excessively noisy the AT's are a much better experience, including braking, ride, noise and MPG. I now only use my KM2's when going offroad or working in the fields.There are many MTR's you can pick up cheap on ebay etc as part used that will suit offroad and lower mileage use. Now if it's a look thing then I much prefer my 255/85 KM2's. Original Member Pie n Pea Club.
110 HCPU Tipper |
||
|
20th Jun 2011 6:56am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
