↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Will the TD5 fit the Puma gearbox
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
Print this entire topic · 
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024
United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
Remember whilst the puma engine is in the transit - it is a VASTLY redesigned engine, both physically and electronically

Whats important is we all have a defender - enjoy it and get on well regardless...me im happy with the puma even if it has any faults (and no radio at the moment)

I was just thinking - When the 300tdi came out there were loads of fault i remember from my time at the factory... Most big companies use the first 12months to fault find...although you cant test for everything. Mike
Post #6318 15th Jan 2009 11:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dgardel



Member Since: 30 Nov 2008
Location: Veneto (Heart & Head)
Posts: 3586
Italy 
AndrewS wrote:


.
Its a thirsty engine compared to the TD5. I ran a TD5 and a Puma to Morocco both 110s with similar kit on, the TD5 still had 1/3 tank of fuel when the Puma was empty and this happened on every fuel stop, all vehicles were filled brim full and every time the Puma shouted first for a re-fill.
Dont start me on reliability issues Evil or Very Mad turbo, fuel system, vac pump, erg ect ect Big Cry


Is the same problem with ALL engine if you compare EU3 with EU4.....

I remember my as Volvos S60 D5: the first was EU3 and I done 15-16 km/l and it was ver very agressive 165 HP, the second was EU4 (165 HP too)and I done 11-12 km/l but slowest if compared with the first expecially in 0-100 km/h (0-60 mph) or in V gear (during WOT in the pass operations)
Post #6481 21st Jan 2009 10:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Eduardo



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: Región Metropolitana
Posts: 2109
Chile 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Stornoway Grey
Juts OT

Quite funny,

EU4 have less emissions but had more fuel consumption: That means more CO2 in to the atmosphere.
Not good for the global warming issue I can said.

Cheers! Eduardo

MY 2007 110 SW PUMA 2.4: Big Fog of 64'
MY 1994 Jayco 1207 Folding camper: "El Tremendo"

Click image to enlarge
Post #6484 21st Jan 2009 11:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
<  Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums