![]() | Home > Technical > L405 (New RR) mpg vs Puma |
|
|
|
| Glynparry25 Member Since: 16 Feb 2009 Location: Miserable Midlands Posts: 3015
|
I am with Rossy on this- computer MPG are MASSIVELY out all the time even if 'Set-up'. Things like speedo accuracy (normally +10%) will affect it
When I had a SG I set it up and even after that it was always wrong. I was apparently averaging 35-40mpg where realistically I was getting 24-28. I now use a iPod app that calculates it all from physical fuel and distance. Good to see they are more fuel efficitnt though Glyn |
||
|
| jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8480
|
i avg 1mpg better than the SG give me on its current set up from actual figures.
i agree that vehicle computers can be out, so lets assume it is 10% then, 46mpg it is....... Cheers James 110 2010 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
|
| Cheshire110 Member Since: 26 Jul 2013 Location: London Posts: 2791
|
according to a few papers, the RR hybrid is returning 40mpg on the silk trail expedition, so over faily slow rough terrain - not bad!
lets face it the hybrid will only matter around town, and when you pay your road tax Land Rovers of all shapes S3 onwards… Daily is a 110 V8. |
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis






