 | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Simple question, need simple answer |
 
|
|
|
| Defender-Stu Member Since: 14 Jun 2012 Location: South West England Posts: 1320  
|
from what i can remember its the same as the 90, but could be wrong
 |
||
4th Sep 2012 7:55am |
|
| JWL Member Since: 26 Oct 2011 Location: Hereford Posts: 3443  
|
Off the top of my head the side panels off a 90 won't fit a 110 as they are longer so I'd say the 110 is slightly shorter.
|
||
|
4th Sep 2012 9:35am |
|
| MartinK Member Since: 02 Mar 2011 Location: Silverdale (Lancashire/Cumbria Border) Posts: 2664 
|
On the spec sheets...
The 90 has a max box length load of 1030mm The 110 has a max box length load of 1750mm But of course the USW would need the rear seats folded down... With only the front wheel out of my mountain bike, and the rear seat folded, the bike fits in lengthways no problem Defender "Puma" 2.4 110 County Utility (possibly the last of the 2.4's) |
||
|
4th Sep 2012 9:44am |
|
| LandRoverAnorak Member Since: 17 Jul 2011 Location: Surrey Posts: 11240
|
In a 110, from the inner edge of the carpet retaining strip across the back door to the back edge of the seat belt brackets on the floor is 1100mm.
I think the 'box' dimensions are to the back of the seats, which lean back into the load space. Darren 110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak "You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia |
||
|
4th Sep 2012 10:18am |
|
| mrandmrsh Member Since: 31 May 2010 Location: Huddersfield Posts: 692 
|
From http://www.landroverweb.com/Pdf-files/Land...nsions.pdf
90 HT Largest box length 1030mm 110 SW Largest box length 1100/1470** Which I take to mean the 110 is 1100 mm with seats up and 1470 with them down. HTH 2015 110 USW XS in Santorini with premium contrast leather seats in tan/black, black headlining and with Dual Finish alloys (in the garage, now on Wolf rims with Goodyear MT/Rs) 2012 '62' 2.2 X-Tech 110 USW now gone ... 1984 90 soft top with full roll cage, 200 tdi engine etc now sold 2012 USW XS 2.2 "FUU" now gone.... |
||
|
4th Sep 2012 11:13am |
|
| ickle Member Since: 22 Jul 2010 Location: South Vendee Posts: 1728  
|
IIRC the blank side panels off an 88 series three fit a 110 station wagon, so I would make the 110 five point 3" shorter.
Keith |
||
|
4th Sep 2012 8:22pm |
|
| WWA Member Since: 12 Aug 2012 Location: Northumberland Posts: 197 
|
Cheers for the replys guys. Looked on the Land Rover website but too many figures, confused my little brain. It's clearer now, it's nearly the same seats up and bigger seats down. Easy! Thanks.
|
||
|
6th Sep 2012 7:15am |
|
| jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 7687 
|
its shorter, noticeable soo, not so much at the bottom but more so further up as the rear seats protrude into the load area compared to a 90HT.
going from a 90HT to a USW i have definitely noticed it. Cheers James 110 XS Utility 130 Puma Station wagon/camper (in the making) 90 Puma Hardtop |
||
|
6th Sep 2012 7:28am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
