![]() | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Making a Puma engine last 200k |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
steveww Member Since: 05 Jan 2022 Location: Malton Posts: 593 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a OBD reader showing engine data, mainly temperatures. When pulling up hill in 6th gear at low RPM the temps shoot up; not so good for the engine. I always change down, more revs, more oil and coolant flow equals lowers temps.
I also use Millers diesel additive on most tank fill ups. Which reminds me I need to get some more. |
||
![]() |
|
jim4244 Member Since: 13 Apr 2014 Location: Bedfordshire Posts: 941 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Personally I think that the quality of the engine oil, make of filter (oil, fuel & air) and frequency of oil and filter changes are the main factor that dictate engine longlivity.
I only use Castrol Magnatec A5 oil and when it comes to filters I only fit genuine Land Rover or Mann. Engine service is 5000 miles or yearly. I also change the fuel and air filter at the same time. I know that this is overkill but filters are cheaper than replacement engines.. Does anyone on here add any oil additives? Jim |
||
![]() |
|
Oldyellar Member Since: 04 Sep 2015 Location: Central Posts: 412 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I had a 2.2 transit tipper it was remapped but it was really economical as well as fast. A year or so after remapping I done a mpg run over a few days trying to achieve max mpg and like a fool labouring the engine. It holed a piston. These engines are van engines made to reved, made to fly up and down streets in 2nd gear doing delivery's. I'll never make that mistake again.
|
||
![]() |
|
Julie Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: Nantes Posts: 588 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Most of the early Pumas for sale in the internet are near or even above 200 K - Transit vans of that âge have even higher mileages. Very few did in deed replace engines / injectors So a more recent Puma should perform like so |
||
![]() |
|
BrickBox Member Since: 05 Oct 2021 Location: Wales Posts: 957 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It’s just typical internet talk where only the failed ones make threads. There are millions of these transit engines in vehicles over the world. We are talking a tiny % of failures in the total. 2008 2.4 110 Utility Station Wagon XS.
|
||
![]() |
|
hank Member Since: 12 Sep 2016 Location: South Wales Posts: 2328 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What clutch is this bw? the Transit 4x4 one SACHS 3000 950 727 ? > 110 XS Double Cab |
||
![]() |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17768 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No, it is actually a Genuine Parts one bought probably c.2015, by which time LR had more or less managed to remember how to make a driven plate. It has lasted a lot longer than I expected, and has had very little springiness for quite some time.
I already have its replacement waiting for when the time comes, which is a Transit 4x4 clutch. |
||
![]() |
|
custom90 Member Since: 21 Jan 2010 Location: South West, England. Posts: 20820 ![]() ![]() |
I’m happy with mine the Sachs one, I has quite bad luck with the LR ones, they just didn’t last but also included slave failure which was the 2.4 original fitment. The 2.2 system seems better. Touch wood. _\Hennessey|Venom| F5/___
___\⭐️Lone|Star|State/___ ____\We|Will|Win/___ ____/🇬🇧🇺🇸\____ _//*⛽️🛢️⚙️🧰*\\_ |
||
![]() |
|
Julie Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: Nantes Posts: 588 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 2.2 clutch really is "better". I had to replace the the master. But I'm still on my original 2012 clutch and 150K. 2 independant mécanos confirmed that I do not have to replace witin the next 2 years (after test drive).
|
||
![]() |
|
o4dn Member Since: 08 Jan 2010 Location: South West Posts: 578 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
150k km or miles? FWIW, my MY2009 Puma 2.4 Defender 90 is still on its original clutch (short of 120k km) “A Land Rover immobilized is a moral defeat for the driver and bad publicity for the vehicle, […] it's up to you to do justice to your Land Rover!” - Land Rover Driving Technique. -- 2009 2.4 Puma Defender 90 SW 1979 Land Rover Series 3 88" Last edited by o4dn on 8th Feb 2025 8:41am. Edited 1 time in total |
||
![]() |
|
Oldyellar Member Since: 04 Sep 2015 Location: Central Posts: 412 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I.think the puma is a very good engine I've had them since 2000 when the first 2.4s and 2.0 came out in the transit the 2.4s back then where tddi rather than tdci and had a bosch vp fuel pump that was basically the same fuel pump as the 300tdo uses. Puma is probably the best engine ever fitted to a transit. |
||
![]() |
|
Julie Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: Nantes Posts: 588 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 2.5 DI on the Transit MK2 is a very good engine, too.
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cc-gl...ansit-bus/ |
||
![]() |
|
90 Dreamer Member Since: 13 Jul 2019 Location: Oop North Posts: 2235 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
just exceptionally slow............
|
||
![]() |
|
Oldyellar Member Since: 04 Sep 2015 Location: Central Posts: 412 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very good engine the Di love the crackle off them. Just horrendously slow and were outdated by 2000 when they were discontinued |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
