↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Technical > Running lights not working after LED upgrade
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
Print this entire topic · 
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 19621

United Kingdom 
blackwolf wrote:
It is quite possible to have power to the brake lights but no power to the tail lights, but it does tend to suggest that there is an earth connection albeit not necessarily the correct earth connection!

Certainly is, which likely denotes that the ground is probably okay, but could be due to varied impedance between the two circuits.
This is why I’m wondering it’s possible, that a female conned for on one of the male pins on the main beam stalk might have popped off.
Reason being, is the sidelight and dipped switch runs its power up through there, as well as main beam.
Main beam and brake light are separate, and working but, if one of the other connections are missing that could be the missing link in the circuit and would also mean the fuse would be in-tact as it wouldn’t blow as the pins are static and the female socket insulated so it’s unlikely there would be a short circuit to blow the fuse but the circuit broken all the same.
The only way of checking that with a multimeter would be impedance check from the ATO fuse, to the tail light pin, if there’s high impedance or no reading then there is a broken circuit there.

And it would be a single connection for all the lights, I doubt it’s a broken wire or split insulation and cracked conductor as that would be only on one side.
I do know on a Puma at least that the exterior lighting ground is on the side the transfer box, and is for front and rear, with two ground wires and two ground eyes, presumably one for each side.
As far as I’m aware, they are the ground for the indicators, sidelights and tail lights and likely the brake lights also.
And that particular flanged I think m6 bolt, liked to come loose by its self, probably due to being removed with a clutch change and vibrate loose it’s self and cause a poor ground on exterior light circuits, and cause all sorts of strange issues such as if you indicated (flashers turned on) the opposite side would light up too.
The particular bolt in question would be torqued to the WSM spec, but still come loose.
So in the end I put a little Loctite 222 (low break off strength thread locker on the threads) and it’s stayed put since, I like that loctite thread locker but I’d not recommend any others due to being too strong. It’s ideal just to ensure something doesn’t come loose in the absence of not being able to practically use a spring washer or nyloc nut or similar locking fastener.
In the WSM, I seem to recall those two ground points being called the ground for the rear lighting loom, but a tall also was for front too, one ground for each side on each grounding eye on the one bolt/stud.

It was the source of quote a headache issue to me once, that reoccurred twice until I tracked it down.
And I tracked it down by doing an open impedance check on each indicator ground and then the reading was high, but wasn’t to a separate god ground I knew it was common ground issue for both sides so led me to a common ground as above.
Normally live issues are a popped off connector, or a short and the latter causing a fuse to be blown so I don’t think a short is the issue here.

One issue can be is that Multimeter test leads aren’t always long enough to test from A to B, but there are some ways around that with test leads.
Little alligator clip test leads can be useful, but also not even long enough sometimes but you do have to take into account the losses from having them in the circuit.
Impedance checks I find are more useful in the unknown than voltage, but best done with power completely isolated and turned off.
I’m thinking loose live or popped off connector in the dipped, sidelight switch area or indicator stalk mech,* especially the latter here.*

It is established brake lights on that circuit is fine, indicators are fine, so grounding is there for that so suggests it’s likely that is okay.
But a common live is missing, a single common live and if that was present and fuse isn’t blown, then a connection maybe missing, either * or behind the fuse panel.

Hope the OP manages to find it, they are difficult to find for sure.
If the original lights are refitted and still don’t work, then it’s probably not impedance but a connection disturbed and misusing causing a broken common live circuit.

I’ll need to rest my head now. Laughing Diesel$ Live$ Matter. ⛽️🛢️👨‍🔧🧰⚙️ RED, WHITE & BOOST! 🇬🇧
Post #1025033 17th Feb 2024 8:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Newbie



Member Since: 04 Oct 2023
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14

United States 1988 Defender 90 2.5 TD ST Select Colour
Alright, lads, here is my update... though it isn't a good one. I've actually gone from annoyed to quite angry.

I mentioned in passing that in addition to my running light issue I also noticed bleed-through with my signals. So, for example, if the right signals were engaged it would flash brightly, but the left signals would blink faintly as well. This same thing was happening with the indicator on the dash. To be sure, it was doing this the last time I drove it. I started it up today and everything was working fine. ?!?! All of my signals were working as they should. (Still no driving lights of course.) I couldn't leave well enough alone, though, because if it acted up before, it would surely act up again. So I installed the recently-acquired RDX flasher relay from B.O.B. that everyone seems to rave about and now, not only did my signals not work, I watched my fuel gauge and voltmeter drop to zero! WTH? As a reminder, the relay that came with my LED lights was three-pin. The original flasher was four-pin and the RDX is four-pin. I believe it should be four-pin and I think I was just "lucky" that worked as well as it did (even though not perfectly).

I removed the RDX relay and re-installed the three-pin one. Nothing. Switched back... nothing. After cursing up a storm I reinstalled the three-pin relay one last time and turned the key to the ACC position. The fuel gauge rose; the voltmeter rose and the signals came back and came back well. I was back to where I started the day and the three-pin relay was installed.

So whatever the hell happened there, I thought I was back on the good foot. I turned the truck off. Then I did what I believe you suggested earlier, blackwolf, and removed both of my tail lights to see if the front running lights (side lights) would work. They didn't, of course. So I reinstalled the tail lights completely tired of working in the cold and started up the truck.

No lights; no fuel gauge; no voltmeter. My headlights work and my hazards work. I think that's it. And they had just worked ten minutes earlier!

So I actually started my day with the truck in a better state than it was left last week - signals working as they should - and finished my day much, much worse than I have been at any point in this process. I've gone from not being able to drive at night to not being able to drive at all.

I think you can tell I can only follow so much of the technical jargon. And I get that in the grand scheme things this is a relatively minor issue; certainly not mechanical (knock wood). I have been receiving very helpful advice on this board, even if I don't understand all of it. The way things are going, I'll likely print all of this up for my mechanic and have him suss it out. It shouldn't HAVE to involve a mechanic though. I'm changing out lights for goodness sake. I liken this to changing out mudflaps and then having my brakes fail.

I don't want you all to keep wasting your time with my issue. If something about this newly evolved problem that now impacts my gauges (!!!) speaks to you and you think there is something you can pass on to me (Newbie by name; Newbie by nature) that I may follow and be able to implement, I'd be very grateful. Until then, who knows... I may start it up tomorrow and find that even my running lights are working. (Even though we all know they won't.) Thanks, guys.

Frustratedly yours,

Jim
Post #1025047 17th Feb 2024 11:31pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums