↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Mantec roof bars - too much mastic in the rain channels
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Howard



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 40

United Kingdom 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 PU Alpine White
Mantec roof bars - too much mastic in the rain channels
Evening guys

Today i had difficulty fitting three Mantec roof bars to my 2012 Utility. I found the mastic in the roof gutters to be uneven to the point where in some places its level with the top of the gutter, and then within a few inches it runs down to the depth you would expect for a channel. I want to fit a clam tent to the rains but the rails are so uneven Its not possible.

Has anybody else had this problem when fitting roof racks etc?
Post #232717 4th May 2013 8:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
borderterrier



Member Since: 09 Dec 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1677

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Aintree Green
Same on mine mate and when you clamp the rack down it digs into the mastic
Post #232726 4th May 2013 9:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BigWheels



Member Since: 21 Mar 2010
Location: Somerset
Posts: 1405

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
Is it only a problem with Mantec. I want some but have also seen Thule & Rhino that look good. Land Rover Defenders. 67 years heritage, minimal appearance changes, still going strong all over the world. Not a fashion vehicle, but fashionable to own. Made for the needy, not the greedy. Ta ta Defender
Post #233947 8th May 2013 11:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
schuee



Member Since: 16 Jul 2012
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 378

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Orkney Grey
Also the same on mine, as Steve said when clamping rack / bars down it digs into the mastic.

Keith
Post #234019 9th May 2013 9:55am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
H4mmy90



Member Since: 21 Apr 2013
Location: Taunton
Posts: 81

2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Orkney Grey
Yeah I have the same with my Thule bars!! Taken the paint off the mastic from being clamped down!!!!!
Post #234267 9th May 2013 10:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
DarrenJ



Member Since: 07 May 2012
Location: North Beds
Posts: 312

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Ditto Crying or Very sad Darren
Post #234269 9th May 2013 10:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
leeds



Member Since: 28 Dec 2009
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 8578

United Kingdom 
The mastic/ dumdum stays elastic whereas the paint on top of the mastic is brittle.

Clamp any roof bar into the rain gutter then the foot will dig into the mastic and this is likely to cause the paint to fractured. OK whereas this may look unsightly when viewed from above it does not seem to have any detrimental effect.

The narrower the foot the more likely it is to dig in.


Brendan
Post #234276 9th May 2013 11:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BigWheels



Member Since: 21 Mar 2010
Location: Somerset
Posts: 1405

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
Presumably roof racks will do the same. Land Rover Defenders. 67 years heritage, minimal appearance changes, still going strong all over the world. Not a fashion vehicle, but fashionable to own. Made for the needy, not the greedy. Ta ta Defender
Post #234510 10th May 2013 10:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
leeds



Member Since: 28 Dec 2009
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 8578

United Kingdom 
Yes roof racks will also dig in to the mastic.

Whereas the cracked paint in the rain gutter may look unsightly to some people, it could be argued that roof bars/rack dug into the mastic is beneficial. Reason being that the bars etc are less likely to 'walk' on rough roads or when they get knocked by tree branch.


Brendan
Post #234565 11th May 2013 9:20am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums