![]() | Home > Off Topic > RANGE ROVER |
|
|
|
| Martin Site Admin Member Since: 02 Apr 2007 Location: Hook Norton Posts: 6736
|
www.fullfatrr.com
www.rrsport.co.uk 1988 90 Td5 NAS soft top
2015 D90 XS SW |
||
|
| jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8493
|
Personally I would have a 4.4 Cheers
James 110 2010 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
|
| barbel jim Member Since: 12 Dec 2012 Location: Northants Posts: 1459
|
From my experience the 3 ltr is under powered in a full fat. I’ve nev r owned one, but driven a friends. I did have a disc4 sdv6, for a few years, and always had that
The intake manifolds are another weak point, around the 120k - 150 miles. I had a 2018 sdv8 Rr sport for all of 8 months, hated everything about it……. Cramped, uncomfortable and bland….. then went 2020 l405 sdv8 ….. another short lived experiment. No end of electrical issues on both, plus regen issues and oil services due every 2500 miles. Spent weeks at the dealers, who eventually said I’d brought the wrong car…… despite them selling it me Now back in a l322 tdv8 The tdv8 is essentially the same engine as the sdv8 without all the ad blu crap….. yes more to tax, but less depreciation, more reliable and imo a much nice drive…. If I was going 2015 onwards it would have to be a petrol……. But I don’t really fancy the fuel economy!! Just my experience, and man maths …. |
||
|
| JoolsB Member Since: 28 Mar 2020 Location: The North Posts: 173
|
I have one of the last l322 4.4’s. I’ve done 40,000 miles in 4 years, now on 100,000 and apart from routine maintenance and a couple of bits that have worn out it’s been absolutely fine.
If you can afford the road fund license and aren’t too bothered about ulez, get the 4.4. If I decide to change up to a 405 I’ll be going for a petrol and probably the 5.0 SC. |
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis






1988 90 Td5 NAS soft top



