↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > eBay & Bargain Spots > Twisted selling of ‘un-Twisted’ stock
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
discomog wrote:
It's been said many times, who in their right mind pays in excess of £100k for a six year old Defender Question


Who pays that for a new one?
Post #890500 10th Mar 2021 6:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CarMan



Member Since: 29 Nov 2010
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 1777

United Kingdom 
mcma1 wrote:
Overfinch also have one but with the Classic Works package, but not an XS

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/2...amp;page=1

And apparently at 2018 2.4 Rolling with laughter Rob

1993 200tdi 90 hard-top
1998 300tdi 90 soft-top
2016 2.2 XS 90 hard-top
Post #890515 10th Mar 2021 7:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bucko



Member Since: 21 Nov 2016
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 43

England 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Orkney Grey
I imagine these companies don’t really expect to sell these vehicles at all at those prices, and in the case of twisted, I can’t imagine they really want to sell their new delivery mile vehicles. It’s all just market manipulation, these companies are in the business of charging top dollar for pimped up vehicles. For twisted to continue churning out £175k tarted up vehicles, it’s easier to justify that price if the market is flooded with £100k standard factory fresh examples.

Twisted will pay extremely good prices to buy back their vehicles, this makes them worth more, they can then charge more and it’s all justified. Along the way, they are boosting the values of all defenders which is a good thing if we already own one, not so much if you’re looking to buy one.

I viewed a vehicle from a large well known specialist, it was blatantly overpriced and the dealer actually said that “this won’t sell, we don’t really want to sell it”. It’s just an exercise in trying to falsely inflate the prices
Post #890573 10th Mar 2021 9:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
markb110



Member Since: 22 May 2010
Location: Guildford
Posts: 2522

England 2002 Defender 90 Td5 HT Epsom Green
The thing about stock holding is that it is either an asset or a liability.

Asset if you are selling and thus rotating your stock

A liability if it is just sitting there not earning money, the quality is reducing and technology supersedes it.

In the event of a total loss, fire for example, the loss adjusters will look at what was paid for the stock (see Supercats comment) and will then apply a price adjustment down based on the time of purchase. Twisted cant buy a vehicle for £29k and expect the insurance company to pay out £85k.

Now if Twisted were looking to sell the business, over valuing the stock certainly makes the companies assets look better, but any accountant worth their salt would see straight through that.

Personally i think that it is pure greed but someone will pay it.
Post #890583 10th Mar 2021 10:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pacha



Member Since: 23 Feb 2020
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 772

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Stornoway Grey
Twisted bought a lot of stock brand new from LR. They keep a steady flow of sales. Rgds.

Chris
Post #890598 10th Mar 2021 10:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
markb110 wrote:
The thing about stock holding is that it is either an asset or a liability.

Asset if you are selling and thus rotating your stock

A liability if it is just sitting there not earning money, the quality is reducing and technology supersedes it.

In the event of a total loss, fire for example, the loss adjusters will look at what was paid for the stock (see Supercats comment) and will then apply a price adjustment down based on the time of purchase. Twisted cant buy a vehicle for £29k and expect the insurance company to pay out £85k.


In the case of someone like Twisted, I'd see the purchase of a base vehicle as the purchase of raw materials. Once you make your finished product then it becomes stock. Raw materials can be accounted for in many ways, and it would not be unusual to account for them on a market value basis rather than depreciation model you suggest.

They are all under the umbrella of charges against the company, so it would it not be financially incautious if the lending institution were not able to recover assets to at least the value of the loan; and to ensure that any insurance of the vehicles made sure to underwrite at least the value of the loan?
Post #890652 11th Mar 2021 10:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Lawrence Whittaker (@ListerLawrence) Tweeted:
Wow!! £70k for a 2015 Defender! Ok so it’s a heritage edition but these are shooting up and up in value! 📈 @collectingcars_ https://t.co/kt3A3aGUWw https://twitter.com/ListerLawrence/status/...11588?s=20


Post #891096 13th Mar 2021 2:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums