↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Looking at a few puma defenders, question on mileage
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 3 <123>
Print this entire topic · 
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 7681
2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
60k 2010 would get my vote.

120k is alot of wear on everything. Assuming Mechanical will have been done as required across the board others things like seats, steering, suspension will need some love.

The 08 plate has potentially done lots of short trips, or is it weekends only use? Possibly more prone to early puma woes.

My 11 plate, 64k still needed new rear crossmember Cheers

James
110 XS Utility
130 Puma Station wagon/camper (in the making)
90 Puma Hardtop
Post #837835 17th Jun 2020 5:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pickles



Member Since: 26 May 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3752
Australia 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Keswick Green
Everyone will have their own views on mileage. Me?..I believe that a low mileage, original vehicle, with a solid service/ownership history is a good place to start.
Pickles.
Post #837956 18th Jun 2020 1:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
andydef90



Member Since: 09 Feb 2015
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 617
United Kingdom 2014 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
as above Thumbs Up
Post #837972 18th Jun 2020 6:59am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
NinetyTD4



Member Since: 22 Apr 2011
Location: North
Posts: 397
Wales 2012 Defender 90 Other SW Keswick Green
Re: Looking at a few puma defenders, question on mileage
Race.it wrote:
So looking to get a puma defender.

I have seen 3 one has 23k on it and is a 2008
Another is 59k and a 2010
And another is 120k but a 2012

They are all the 2.4 versions, now I can seen the mileage history and all look to be fine (not tampered with)

They are all the same trim level (basic) same price, give or take 1k

Which one would be the best option from your opinion?


Most important is how it was cared for. I have seen bullsh*t Defender TD4 coming back from commercial leasing and looking ready for scrapyard after 2 to 3 years. When the tranny came, everybody was aware it might be the last version of it and it became a lifestyle object - all the baby boomers having grown up looking at Landrovers finally tried to let a dream come true and ordered Defender. I know of dealer just rolling the factory pre-assembled Defender as is from delivery to customer in masses - no final assembly, no corrosion protection, no cleaning - in high masses. If you get one, you will be surprise how bad a three year old can be.

I am surprised reading of a 2012 2.4 PUMA, do you mean registered 2012, so a late showroom car? Usually a MY2012 would be a 2.2 or?

My opinion on the three option:
- wouldn't go for the 2008, too close to the first 2007 year and maybe still has teething remains
- the 2010 reads reasonable and would be my number one to look at
- the 2012 I would question why it is a 2.4 on 2012, mileage is irrelevant if cared for correct Never forget: cars have owner, Landrover have field service personnel.
Post #837977 18th Jun 2020 7:38am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Race.it



Member Since: 27 Aug 2019
Location: Algeciras
Posts: 741
Spain 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Alaska White
Hi,

I have not got the chassis number yet for the 2012 to check the actual build date but they keep telling me it’s a 2.4.

Basically I am trying to avoid the 2.2 as I don’t like the idea of the dpf. If I find out it’s a 2.2 then the 2012 is dropped.

The 2008 is actually registered 11/2008 so I guess that’s really a 2009. Any idea on how to confirm the model year?

Thanks all for the reply’s so far

John
Post #838145 18th Jun 2020 9:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 421
France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
Why drop the 2.2 ? Its clutch and EGR are more reliable. The injectors are piezzo and not magnetic - far more reliable.
There are also a few other improvements by Tata.

Is it the DPF ? Never had any issues and I've more than 100000 on the clock (1000...1500 rpm)...

I'd rather drop the 2.4s because they've been optimized (economized) by FORD Laughing
Post #838164 18th Jun 2020 10:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 421
France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
Race.it wrote:
Any idea on how to confirm the model year?


They changed the font color of the logo :
In 2010, the symbol update happened: its gold color was replaced by the silver one.
https://listcarbrands.com/land-rover-logo/

Don't know if that helps ... Wink
Post #838165 18th Jun 2020 10:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16856
United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Julie wrote:
Why drop the 2.2 ? Its clutch and EGR are more reliable. The injectors are piezzo and not magnetic - far more reliable.
There are also a few other improvements by Tata.

Is it the DPF ? Never had any issues and I've more than 100000 on the clock (1000...1500 rpm)...

I'd rather drop the 2.4s because they've been optimized (economized) by FORD Laughing


It's simpler, easier to work on, has an identical clutch, no dpf, and better still has an oil pump that keeps working, plus a genuine 10AS not the counterfeit one used on the last 2.2s.
Post #838170 18th Jun 2020 10:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Race.it



Member Since: 27 Aug 2019
Location: Algeciras
Posts: 741
Spain 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Alaska White
What ^^ he said, but what’s a 10A?
Post #838245 19th Jun 2020 10:49am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
williamthedog



Member Since: 29 Dec 2012
Location: south wales
Posts: 3441
2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 PU Tamar Blue
^^ the alarm /immobiliser unit.
Post #838256 19th Jun 2020 11:52am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 421
France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
... and the 10AS is in the 2012 Defender, too Thumbs Up

2.2 or 2.4 is a decision between an M1 car and an N1 utility (which saves you money, at least here in France) as well as EURO4 and EURO5 or Denso and Bosch injectors etc. etc.

If you love to work on cars, take a vehicle from the 1990s or earlier. The older the better. That's fun. Very Happy
Post #838612 20th Jun 2020 10:31pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16856
United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
There are plenty of N1 2.4 options, it's all down to body style.
Post #838624 20th Jun 2020 11:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 7681
2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
my 2.4 is no. From jul 10 onwards for 11my I believe. Cheers

James
110 XS Utility
130 Puma Station wagon/camper (in the making)
90 Puma Hardtop
Post #838630 20th Jun 2020 11:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16856
United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Yes, plus any with a commercial body-style (such as a double cab) from introduction.
Post #838634 20th Jun 2020 11:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
NinetyTD4



Member Since: 22 Apr 2011
Location: North
Posts: 397
Wales 2012 Defender 90 Other SW Keswick Green
Julie wrote:
2.2 or 2.4 is a decision between an M1 car and an N1 utility

No, late 2.4 starting production after summer 10 as MY2011 are all N1. Never forget: cars have owner, Landrover have field service personnel.

Last edited by NinetyTD4 on 21st Jun 2020 8:13am. Edited 1 time in total
Post #838642 21st Jun 2020 2:30am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 3 <123>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
<  Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums