↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > 2011 Model 2.4 Defender- Diesel Emissions Upgrade
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
dorsetsmith



Member Since: 30 Oct 2011
Location: South West
Posts: 4554

Strange that they'll recall for an emissions problem, emissions in the news at present time so the free fix good for PR
Post #783378 27th Jul 2019 10:16am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6264

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
just noticed this topic is raised elsewhere - sorry.

Embarassed
Post #783382 27th Jul 2019 10:30am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 421

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
Hi Michael, if I was you, I'd just think of summer holidays in Turkey. That may end with a mileage somewhat near 70K Laughing
Post #783421 27th Jul 2019 2:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
spudfan



Member Since: 10 Sep 2007
Location: Co Donegal
Posts: 4475

Ireland 
This is how they want to tackle the issue.
JLR has made it clear to owners that the recall will not affect power outputs and has released information about what side-effects to expect. On gasoline cars, the stop-start function might operate at lower engine temperatures. Diesel cars could get noisier on cold-starts and could idle at lower revs at junctions. JLR also said owners of diesel cars could see higher consumption of the AdBlue urea additive that reduces exhaust NOx levels. JLR said that “all of the changes have been reviewed and agreed with the VCA,” meaning the certification agency is happy the cars will return to the agreed certification figures
"Lowering the idle speed on diesels is likely to be a simple fix to drop the fuel consumption by a few grams, but that could affect drivability of the car. “Manufacturers don’t like their car to idle at excessive revs, because it raises CO2, but there is a limit to how far you can bring them down. Too low and the car starts to sound rough and it affects drivability,” Archer said.
JLR disputed Archer’s claims lowering the idle speed will mean that the cars will be trickier to drive. “The reduction in idle speed is not going to introduce any drivability concerns,” the company said in a statement. “The engine management system ensures that all of the required anti-stall devices are employed to mitigate any drive take-up engine rev deficiency.”
Here's the full thing.
https://europe.autonews.com/automakers/jag...ons-recall
I don't see the Defender mentioned on this recall list.
https://www.vehicle-recall.co.uk/recall/R/2019/049
Here is a list of the recalls for Defender in the U.K.
https://www.vehicle-recall.co.uk/make/LAND-ROVER/DEFENDER
https://car-recalls.eu/make/land-rover/
Mine is a 2011 2.4. I suppose it is being lumped into the same emissions category as the 2011 2.2. This seems a little unfair as the 2.2 has a DPF in the emissions system. As of yet I have had no recall letter (Ireland) but if there is a European rollout it could come later. 1982 88" 2.25 diesel
1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali
2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu
2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai
Post #783702 28th Jul 2019 11:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 421

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
Excellent research Thumbs Up

The contrôle centres always mix it up. Mine's end 2011 (i.e. a 2.2) and therefore checked with the limits for the 2.4 which makes the MOTs quite comfy for me Laughing
And the JLR strategy counting the VIN without any difference between 2.4 and 2.2 doesn't help here ...
Post #783770 29th Jul 2019 12:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jmw



Member Since: 03 Aug 2019
Location: Brighton
Posts: 3

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Zermatt Silver
Really useful info, thanks. Having received the recall letter, think I’ll wait to see how this develops...
Post #784667 3rd Aug 2019 2:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums