↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Faults and mpg
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
Faults and mpg
A bit of info for you.

Those that have had poor mpg and/or the various ecu faults.

I've switch the maf and by mpg is now up to 28mpg from getting as low as 23.

Not check for further faults...next woul be the erg...but certainly a new Maf has helped Mike
Post #59076 14th Feb 2011 7:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
Mikes mine is in now but I am not holding my breath, how much is one?
Post #59082 14th Feb 2011 8:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bell-auto-services



Member Since: 08 Jul 2007
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2232

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Orkney Grey
Its amazing what a semi faulty component can produce fault or driveability wise, Im glad you have found an answer to your problem.

It does go to show that young cars to have component failures that cause issues, and when those failures are found the difference to the car is outstanding.

What are you doing with the old faulty maf ? id be interested in measuring its output compared to a new maf to see the % of difference that causes problems.

Pete


Last edited by bell-auto-services on 14th Feb 2011 8:15pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #59087 14th Feb 2011 8:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
£33 ish depending on where and who Thumbs Up

I wasn't going the LR route of just replace everything! So as the maf starts at £30...egr is around £50 and ill see...but at the moment I'm happy.

I'll throw some additive in when I get home. Mike
Post #59088 14th Feb 2011 8:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
bell-auto-services wrote:
Its amazing what a semi faulty component can produce fault or driveability wise, Im glad you have found an answer to your problem.

It does go to show that young cars to have component failures that cause issues, and when those failures are found the difference to the car is outstanding.

What are you doing with the old faulty maf ? id be interested in measuring its output compared to a new maf to see the % of difference that causes problems.

Pete


Pete

At the moment it's in the car as an emergency spare.
Happy if you want to have a play with it...

Definitely getting between 3 and 5 mpg better...you can see it in the fuel needle with me even converting it (which I've done)

The egr is my next, but that's to manage some logged faults. Mike
Post #59089 14th Feb 2011 8:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bell-auto-services



Member Since: 08 Jul 2007
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2232

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Orkney Grey
If i can have a play with it ill send it back for your spare no problem after ive done some measurements.

Ill pay for the postage to send to me if you want to paypal me a request to bellautos@hotmail.com


Id like to get to the bottom of these puma issues once and for all as i know im my heart of hearts the pumas components are the main problem to many standard cars and some as you are aware are my customers.


Pete
Post #59092 14th Feb 2011 8:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
bell-auto-services wrote:
If i can have a play with it ill send it back for your spare no problem after ive done some measurements.

Ill pay for the postage to send to me if you want to paypal me a request to bellautos@hotmail.com


Id like to get to the bottom of these puma issues once and for all as i know im my heart of hearts the pumas components are the main problem to many standard cars and some as you are aware are my customers.


Pete


Sure thing

I'm in Scotland now...will do it when I'm back if that's ok? Mike
Post #59096 14th Feb 2011 8:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bell-auto-services



Member Since: 08 Jul 2007
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2232

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Orkney Grey
Perfect thank you.

Im hoping to make a basic useable pcb that will measure the output of the maf and indicate with some LEDs the state it reaches when driving to try and advise the owner if the maf if weak or not.

Pete
Post #59098 14th Feb 2011 8:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
Sounds a good project

I'm begging to think there is a state between new and working well and broken with maf's

Be interesting o see as even 3/4mpg is significant...especially when mob on a puma can go lower than a 5l supercharged v8 sport!

I'll email you when I'm back. Mike
Post #59121 14th Feb 2011 10:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bell-auto-services



Member Since: 08 Jul 2007
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2232

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Orkney Grey
You are correct, their is a state when a maf can work but not fully or correctly. though when it works badly but is not short or open circuit for example it wont flag a fault in the pcm.

The TD5 is common for this and may only read EG up to 500 kg/flow but a good new one will read up to 660 ish at high rpm and max out at 720 where it would default back to 0kg/hr flow and put the car into a sort of limp mode where it will drink fuel and drive different to a fully working maf.

The puma is in a simlar working range to this.


Pete
Post #59128 14th Feb 2011 10:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
Interesting stuff...and it's that that I recon is more problematic...I'll look forward to your results! Wink Mike
Post #59132 14th Feb 2011 10:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
Just to add...last two tanks (yes in one day) returned 28.9 and 29.7 mpg Exclamation Exclamation

Looking forward to see if the trend continues Mike
Post #59453 16th Feb 2011 9:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Lorryman100



Member Since: 01 Oct 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 2686

Mike, where those fuel figures for a steady speed/distance driving?
Post #59464 16th Feb 2011 10:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5024

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
Lorryman100 wrote:
Mike, where those fuel figures for a steady speed/distance driving?


I should just say Scottish highland roads and leave it at that!

But a mixture would be fair...complicated answer.. The two 29 ish returns first tank was after driving various tracks and main roads, some snow covered, speeds varying 50% varying between 30 and 40 climbing/descending the other 50/60mph twisting highland roads (and probably small amount of town).

The second greater mileage covered 70% between 40 and 60 favouring 50-60 and the rest varying low speed tracks, dodgy roads and towns.

I forced myself to fill at Tesco last night (8p saving per l) so I'll see next fueling.

Does tha help? Mike
Post #59471 16th Feb 2011 10:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Lorryman - Just checked my Road Lite application and on my 90 over the last 9,359 miles I have averaged 27.68 mpg! Thumbs Up If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #59473 16th Feb 2011 10:50pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums