 | Home > Puma (Tdci) > odd question |
 
|
|
|
| austen Member Since: 11 Mar 2008 Location: Sydney Posts: 52   
|
Could be something to do with the de-tuned nature of the TDCi in the Defender application. The 2.4 Transit produces 135 bhp but the Def only 122.
Austen. |
||
16th Jun 2008 12:28am |
|
| Happyoldgit Member Since: 14 Sep 2007 Location: Norfolk Posts: 3471  
|
I would imagine some of it is also down to the Transit's generally smoother and cleaner shape and that some of the power is not being sapped by the drag of the additional cogs, gears and live axle in the drivetrain.
|
||
|
16th Jun 2008 7:58am |
|
| Petrovich Member Since: 24 Jan 2008 Location: Sankt-Peterburg Posts: 75 
|
air resistance Defender 110 '07
|
||
|
16th Jun 2008 8:14am |
|
| Ads90 Member Since: 16 Jun 2008 Location: Cots-on-the-Wolds Posts: 800 
|
Apparently the modern Transit is more aerodynamic than the E-Type Jag...
The 4wd will also account for a few mpgs. Hi all by the way, I've been lurking on here for some time, reading posts while I try and decide what Defender to buy next. |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 11:27am |
|
| Alex e Member Since: 23 Apr 2007 Location: Home isn't it Posts: 204  
|
Hi Ads90,
I recomend a TD5, mind you i would say that. lol mines for sale next month  |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 3:56pm |
|
| mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5024 
|
by far the TDCi - td5 just misses it (sorry) Mike
|
||
|
16th Jun 2008 5:20pm |
|
| Ads90 Member Since: 16 Jun 2008 Location: Cots-on-the-Wolds Posts: 800
|
^ lol - this is the quandary I'm facing...
I've recently sold my Defender 50th, and I've been test driving both TD5s and TDCis several times now, and I'm still unsure - i would have to gear-up a TD5 to make it better on motorway, TDCi has the 6th gear, TD5 is cheaper, TDCi has better heating, demisting etc etc. Guess the first really good example of either version that comes in-budget that I drive I'll end up buying! (Its got to be in green by the way, oh and a 90 - sorry Alex!). Last edited by Ads90 on 16th Jun 2008 6:10pm. Edited 1 time in total |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 6:08pm |
|
| Verdone Member Since: 30 Apr 2008 Location: Gent Posts: 67  
|
Tdci has better mpg then a td5, might be worth considering in this time and age, aswell with the co2
 going on 
Greetings Verdone |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 6:10pm |
|
| Ads90 Member Since: 16 Jun 2008 Location: Cots-on-the-Wolds Posts: 800
|
Yes - this is mainly why I am changing from my lovely V8 50th to an oil-burner... I've been reading the 'how many mpgs' threads with interest - but there seems to be wildly different results - I would like to think I would get at least 30, maybe a bit more out of one driving it gently. I'm not sure whether a TD5 with the ratio change would equal a standard TDCi on fuel? Anyone had direct experience of both? |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 6:17pm |
|
| mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5024
|
Driving 300's TD5 and the TDCi - it is better in every respect not just one.
MPG is a weird one with the rack and tent on its doing about 27/8mpg if i hammer it i think it goes to about 26.6 Ill see what the winch does when i fit that. Mike |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 6:26pm |
|
| dave's 110 Member Since: 11 Jun 2008 Location: Norfolk Posts: 45 
|
why not have a remap on the ECU up it to 135 bhp see if you can get more mpg that way
I'm getting 27 / 28 mpg with full roof rack and roof tent with foot hard in the floor
Dave |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 7:11pm |
|
| mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5024
|
I think im going to - but its been an expensive 3 months and being a pilot - the hourly rates when i rent is - well eye watering, (my new plane in my club is £4.15 a minute)
When things settle - remap it is Mike |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 7:18pm |
|
| dave's 110 Member Since: 11 Jun 2008 Location: Norfolk Posts: 45
|
Is £4.15 with fuel?
Whats the MPG of a plane then ? more or less then 27 /28 MPG 
Dave |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 7:22pm |
|
| mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5024
|
£4.15 yes is "wet" so with fuel.
Whilst i do the performance calculations ive never worked out MPG. range is key - but with a couple of hundred mph easy - you get where you need to be  Mike |
||
|
16th Jun 2008 8:29pm |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
