↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > General & Technical (L663) > If you could design the next generation defender?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 3 <123>
Print this entire topic · 
JAY BOY



Member Since: 04 May 2010
Location: Not here
Posts: 1706

Wales 
Muddybigdog

You have just described a Disco Whistle

Theres nothing wrong with the Defender if it doesn't leak.
Post #394904 1st Feb 2015 8:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mountain_man



Member Since: 09 Dec 2011
Location: Right side of Offas Dyke
Posts: 756

Wales 
As a farmer I think what would have sold well and would could still work would be to stretch a TD5 Disco chassis to 120 inch and stick a pickup back on it. Refined, very good tow vehicle, easy enough to maintain. Could fit Puma engine and 6 speed box to bring it up to date. Galvanise the chassis as a USP and bingo. Many UK farmers would buy them I am convinced.

Something like that white one from Australia (Goggle Disco Ute)
Post #394931 1st Feb 2015 8:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
The fact i wont be able to buy another defender as it is , there is a very very good chance i wont be a land rover customer again
Post #394946 1st Feb 2015 9:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pickles



Member Since: 26 May 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3755

Australia 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Keswick Green
SS90 wrote:
Can't even be improved upon IMO, all the little idiosyncrasies are one of the characteristics that made them so loveable and unique. It's done the job for decades, if it's not broken why fix it? Land Rover's other vehicles cater for most of the other requirements in comfort etc.

My thoughts too.
I don't really need any more power, but the option of a more powerful engine would have been good,...a 3L V6 Turbo Diesel would have been nice, & what I would've ticked had it been on the option list. Even the 150HP tune now offered on a couple of the celebration models would've been welcome.
But We're perfectly happy with what we have. Pickles.
Post #394949 1st Feb 2015 9:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
shaggydog



Member Since: 12 Aug 2012
Location: Kent
Posts: 3346

United Kingdom 1991 Defender 110 200 Tdi USW Arles Blue
To be honest the only factory advancement they could have made to make it instantly better was a better security system.

And bringing back FC rims.

And galvenising the doors and chassis and bulkhead.

And the colour blue. Running Restoration Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/post323197.html#323197

Self confessed mileage hunter Very Happy
Post #394954 1st Feb 2015 10:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Blondie



Member Since: 31 May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 46

United Kingdom 
Lots people complain about elbow room.

I have been driving defenders daily and over 250 000 miles (wow thats the distance to the moon) for the last 20+ years and being 6'3" never had a problem with elbow room or head room.

Hope my puma will be as good as the last two when it arrives on 1st of March Smile

I just hope the DC100 will be as iconic as it predecessors.
Post #394986 1st Feb 2015 10:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16892

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Sort out the minor niggles (build quality, leaks, heating and ventilation, clutch, driveline clonks), build in decent security so they are hard to steal, but otherwise leave it alone.

Sadly it won't happen, not just for regulatory reasons, but because the cost of hand-building a vehicle is simply too great.
Post #395000 1st Feb 2015 11:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
need4speed



Member Since: 23 Nov 2012
Location: Kilmarnock
Posts: 746

Im not too fussed on styling. I dont have a problem styling wise with some of the LR ideas. However it must be modular, modular, MODULAR.

Sadly i know it wont be.
Post #396689 7th Feb 2015 4:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Car technology troublesome but important to buyers
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/25/...MC20150225

Interesting that this figures so highly on new buyers lists - and JLR do so poorly apparently - "Two consistently low-scoring brands were at the bottom of the J.D. Power study. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' Fiat finished last while next-to-last was Land Rover, owned by Tata Motors of India."
Post #402301 26th Feb 2015 9:31am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Black Puma



Member Since: 31 Jan 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 175

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 SW Sumatra Black
Basically there is nothing wrong with the current car except susceptibility to corrosion and all the mechanical issues. But for a new Defender.... back to basics, utilitarian, minimal and well made. As such:

Same body shape
Return to front opening vents
Less bling
No leather, just high tech washable wear resistant cloths and plastics, made from recycles materials
Back to even more basic than basic
100% Corrosion proof
Better quality control
Aluminum or galvanised chassis
Revamp headlight surrounds
Turn 90 into a 95 maybe
Re-engineer everything with care so it works and wont need 10 warranty returns from new
Discreet but utilitarian airbags
A system that can actually hold the weight of the spare rear wheel and tyre. For the life of the car!
Increase fuel capacity
Own the look and integrity of the car making it the exact opposite of an FJ Cruiser

Ethics, hows this for an idea, stupid?:
Instead of thinking of the bottom line profits- how much extra money they can make from this new evolution/incarnation. Sell more more more, not enough profit, more more more. How about making the car to the best of their ability, for the current customers that love it- how the current customers and Britain want it. Then after paying your shop floor staff the best wages, give ALL Defender profits from here on, to charity. Companies spend a fortune on race car teams and other sponsorships for profile. Land Rover should keep their Heratige alive, respectfully, for profile at zero profit to themselves. Thus acknowledge that this car created Land Rover and after 67 years of taking profits from this car, it's time to give something back. Land Rover, invest in your customers, employes, world around you, and your sense of fun.

Importantly-
Create new division called Land Rover Commercial
Then our car can be separated from the Luxury aspect of the brand. Most sale persons or service departments treat Defenders with contempt because they have less hassle and more money from cashed up Range Rover customers (and wannabes).
This also frees them from the polar association with the Defender, so unhindered, they can continue asserting themselves as a prestigious luxury brand.

(On a side note, I am sure even in its current form, that the Defender, surely must be profitable. How many cars are made per day, selling on average £25,000 each on road at dealers!!!)

BMW Motorrad?-
I think Land Rover should also examine BMW motorcycles and their 2014 cult release of the lo-fi but highly well made R Nine T. That works for BMW Motorrad who have established themselves as an expensive technology driven brand. Have a look at the R Nine T online.

Historic center?:
How fantastic would it be, with this new Defender, to incorporate a classic center manufacturing new parts for old cars and offering genuine Land Rover restoration service.

Porcshe Classic Website



Apologies for the long waffle Embarassed
Post #406168 10th Mar 2015 3:57am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
apt100



Member Since: 05 Mar 2015
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1547

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Aintree Green
Better security
Better corrosion resistance
Rear seats (where fitted) that remove easily

and for people that like to fit them... a proper factory fitted snorkel with the entire intake system designed to be compatible ie airtight/waterproof.
Post #406397 10th Mar 2015 8:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Venomator



Member Since: 25 Aug 2014
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 2087

United Kingdom 
dgardel wrote:
the NEW Defender MUST BE like this one Whistle Rolling with laughter
But GREEN... Mr. Green

I am a simple soul with simple needs and this will do (almost) as is... Whistle

And enough about the jerrycan sides already... Rolling with laughter



Click image to enlarge
 Rog... Mr. Green
The GREEN One...


MY2016 Urban Truck Build Thread - http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic40548....al[/color]
Post #406411 10th Mar 2015 10:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
apt100



Member Since: 05 Mar 2015
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1547

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Aintree Green
Are they parking sensors on the roof Question
Post #406420 10th Mar 2015 10:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Monmouth



Member Since: 27 Nov 2013
Location: Gwynedd
Posts: 45

Wales 1990 Defender 90 300 Tdi SW Firenze Red
I'd like an engine that's as good as the best variants of Toyota's 4.2L diesel engine and a 6 speed version of the New Process NP435 gearbox. Stronger axles, diffs and halfshafts would also be required. 1990 Defender 300TDi
Post #406424 10th Mar 2015 10:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
GREENI



Member Since: 22 Aug 2010
Location: staffs
Posts: 10363

United Kingdom 
4.7 v8 'yota lump or 6.7 Cummins diesel.
Dana 60 axles.
Auto

The rest, the same as is. But with opening air flaps in the bulkhead....ya know, proper bulkheads Mr. Green
Post #406433 10th Mar 2015 11:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 3 <123>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums