↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > eBay & Bargain Spots > Ebay...Bargain or Not?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
jubjub



Member Since: 14 Jan 2017
Location: surrey
Posts: 20

Ebay...Bargain or Not?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/landrover-defend...SwUKxYgOoU

Opinions on this please?
Apologies if in wrong section....
Should I, or shouldn't I? It looks nice....
Post #607642 7th Mar 2017 9:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LR90XS2011



Member Since: 05 Apr 2011
Location: bickenhill
Posts: 3613

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Galway Green
wont be a bargain if it has some issues with the DVLA DEFENDER 90 TDCI XS,

I hope everyone is well and your land rovers make you happy
Post #607646 7th Mar 2017 9:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ChrisWoods



Member Since: 29 Dec 2016
Location: Spreyton
Posts: 164

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Aintree Green
Bargain at £3k Yeh but with 5 days left I should imagine it will make fair money. Reasonably high mileage though. 2009 2.4TDCi XS Utility Wagon.
Post #607648 7th Mar 2017 9:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ickle



Member Since: 22 Jul 2010
Location: South Vendee
Posts: 1728

France 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Alpine White
I saw it and wondered....

Would need 100% reliable and traceable receipts for the body and chassis, but on a 2nd hand chassis does that not make it a Q plate?

Keith
Post #607649 7th Mar 2017 9:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jubjub



Member Since: 14 Jan 2017
Location: surrey
Posts: 20

I was tempted last time this was one....
Ickle, as you say surely should be a 'Q" plate, unless DVLA not been informed.
It has a current MOT. Its LEZ compliant....

Should be impossible that its on a TDCI chassis...but on "N" plate
Bulkhead/panels can be bought secondhand...
Post #607653 7th Mar 2017 10:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LR90XS2011



Member Since: 05 Apr 2011
Location: bickenhill
Posts: 3613

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Galway Green
looking at it again makes me even more suspicious, TDCI axles, body and chassis would surely exceed the points required to keep the original reg DEFENDER 90 TDCI XS,

I hope everyone is well and your land rovers make you happy
Post #607655 7th Mar 2017 10:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jubjub



Member Since: 14 Jan 2017
Location: surrey
Posts: 20

Indeed, doesn't make 8 points.

Whats the feeling son the chassis? Surely should have a vin number stamped on it? If its not visible, i assume it has an issue?
If TDCI chassis, has it got to run TDCI axles?
Is retrofitting the 300tdi engine box straightforward?same mounting points etc?
Post #607658 7th Mar 2017 10:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jubjub



Member Since: 14 Jan 2017
Location: surrey
Posts: 20

LR90XS2011 wrote:
looking at it again makes me even more suspicious, TDCI axles, body and chassis would surely exceed the points required to keep the original reg


Q plate from DVLA?
Wonder how its passed MOT? Recall seeing thread whereby MOT tester lies to see chassis number/VIN on chassis, not just on
logbook or previous MOT certificate?
Post #607660 7th Mar 2017 10:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ickle



Member Since: 22 Jul 2010
Location: South Vendee
Posts: 1728

France 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Alpine White
It could be a new unregistered chassis - unlikely though, much more likely to be a second hand unit from a stolen recovered....Hence my thoughts about traceable receipts.

Body counts for nothing, axles, steering and suspension are so similar as to be interchangeable, so should be OK, I think the engine mounts are different, but that's just a bit of weld.

The correct way would be the original chassis number cut out of the old chassis & proof of its scrappage, then this plate, riveted or screwed over the tdci number, have the paper trail and all should be well, still not sure about the original number though.

A few years ago, it wouldn't have raised an eyebrow, things are different now.
Post #607668 7th Mar 2017 10:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LR90XS2011



Member Since: 05 Apr 2011
Location: bickenhill
Posts: 3613

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Galway Green
from DVLA web site
Keep a vehicle’s original registration number
A rebuilt vehicle can keep its original registration number if you can prove you’ve used:

the original unmodified chassis or bodyshell (car or light van)
a new chassis or monocoque bodyshell of the same specification as the original (car or light van)
the original unmodified frame (motorbike)
a new frame of the same specification as the original (motorbike)
You must also have 2 other major components from the original vehicle from the following lists.

For cars or light vans:

suspension (front and back)
steering assembly
axles (both)
transmission
engine DEFENDER 90 TDCI XS,

I hope everyone is well and your land rovers make you happy


Last edited by LR90XS2011 on 7th Mar 2017 10:29pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #607674 7th Mar 2017 10:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jubjub



Member Since: 14 Jan 2017
Location: surrey
Posts: 20

Don't like to cast any aspersions...
TDCI chassis, axles, bulkhead and dash, and then one would then put in a 200k mile 300tdi engine/box?
I the consensus then that no one here has a barge pole long enough to lend me Wink
Post #607676 7th Mar 2017 10:27pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bigee



Member Since: 24 Oct 2010
Location: middle of nowhere...
Posts: 78

Wales 2002 Defender 90 Td5 Braemar LE Blenheim Silver
I always thought it was an absolute no-no to put a newer chassis (used one that is ) on an older vehicle ? A bit like car number plates...Would surely have to be on a Q plate ,presuming its all been declared of course Whistle
Post #607687 7th Mar 2017 10:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jubjub



Member Since: 14 Jan 2017
Location: surrey
Posts: 20

LR90XS2011 wrote:
from DVLA web site
Keep a vehicle’s original registration number
A rebuilt vehicle can keep its original registration number if you can prove you’ve used:

the original unmodified chassis or bodyshell (car or light van)
a new chassis or monocoque bodyshell of the same specification as the original (car or light van)
the original unmodified frame (motorbike)
a new frame of the same specification as the original (motorbike)
You must also have 2 other major components from the original vehicle from the following lists.

For cars or light vans:

suspension (front and back)
steering assembly
axles (both)
transmission
engine


No way it can meet the criteria then. Engine and transmission is all good.
The body has no markings on it, however some panels can be changed, so potentially body could be ok?
The fall down would be chassis.
A TDCI chassis is different from a TD5/300/200TDi ??
Post #607694 7th Mar 2017 10:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
DSC-off



Member Since: 16 Oct 2014
Location: North East
Posts: 1351

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Aintree Green
Looks like the only bits that could be from the original vehicle are the engine, gearbox, dash gauges, and service book. Even that's not proven. A complete Puma minus it's engine and gearbox would be another way of looking at it.

What does happen to all those stolen Defenders?
Post #607696 7th Mar 2017 10:50pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jubjub



Member Since: 14 Jan 2017
Location: surrey
Posts: 20

^^^
Confused

Fitting older engine to throw off the scent?
I take it we are fearing the worse.... Whistle
Post #607697 7th Mar 2017 10:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums