↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Td5 > TD5 Fault Code Advice. (3,5) DRIVER DEMAND PROBLEM 1
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4395
United Kingdom 
TD5 Fault Code Advice. (3,5) DRIVER DEMAND PROBLEM 1
Evening all. I think my Defender may have a problem... Just the one... Rolling Eyes

Anyway the fault code list goes like this;

NANOCOM - TD5ENG.APP - TD5 ENGINE fault file

(3,5) DRIVER DEMAND PROBLEM 1, (LOGGED HIGH).
---
(10,4) GEARBOX / ABS DRIVE OPEN LOAD, (LOGGED).
---
(14,4) GEARBOX / ABS DRIVE OPEN LOAD, (CURRENT).
---
(20,2) TURBOCHARGER OVERBOOSTING, (LOGGED).
---
(14,6) MIL LAMP DRIVE OPEN LOAD, (CURRENT).
---
(14,7) GLOWPLUG LAMP DRIVE OPEN LOAD, (CURRENT).
---
(10,3) TACHOMETER DRIVE OPEN LOAD, (CURRENT).
---

The last three I caused by testing the systems. The Over-boost is due to recently getting a remap and not having a boost box.

The two gearbox ones are odd and I do not have ABS on the 110.

It is the first one that I need advice on. Driver demand has got to be the accelerator pedal, right?! How do I go about testing the pedal?

Will TDCI pedals work on a TD5 as they are much cheaper. Look similar too from what I can see.
Post #594254 18th Jan 2017 10:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Sphere



Member Since: 26 Apr 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 725
United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Keswick Green
Yes I am fairly sure it's the pedal a friend had the same however from memory he changed the pedal and no change but can't remember what solved it.
Post #594256 18th Jan 2017 10:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Paulv8



Member Since: 09 Jun 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 616
1989 Defender 90 V8 Petrol CSW Alpine White
Clear them all first and see if they return. V8 90...WIP
Post #594257 18th Jan 2017 10:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4395
United Kingdom 
Yep done that this is the 3rd time in a week the (3,5) fault has appeared... Balls!
Post #594260 18th Jan 2017 10:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
4RF RDS



Member Since: 19 Jul 2015
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 898
Canada 2000 Defender 110 Td5 XS CSW Epsom Green
Okay you could try clearing them (again) and then disconnect the battery and hold the pos and neg together (neither connected to the battery) for about a minute. Reconnect and try reading codes again. If the codes remain time for some further digging or a better diagnostic like a Nanocom or testbook. 2010 Range Rover MkIII Autobiography Super Charged (Idris)
2003 Range Rover Mk III (Desmond FitzWilliam)
2000 Defender 110 CSW TD5 (CTX)
1992 Range Rover Classic (Lizzy)
1972 Series III 300 Tdi (Stanwood)
1967 MGB GT

Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.
H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Post #594285 19th Jan 2017 12:46am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
psimpson7



Member Since: 20 Nov 2013
Location: Gold Coast, Qld.
Posts: 221
Australia 2014 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Loire Blue
Its not unheard of for them to fail although its quite unusual.

I had one fail on mine when it was a TD5 and still under warranty. They replaced it straight away and after that I always carried a spare new one just in case. 2001 90 HT 6.0LS/6spdAuto.
2003 90 td5 soft top.
2014 90 XS SW 2.2.
Post #594291 19th Jan 2017 2:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MadTom



Member Since: 10 Sep 2013
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 572
Czech Republic 1999 Defender 130 Td5 HCPU Baltic Blue
There are two types of pedals for TD5 - older with 2 ways and newer with 3 ways. Way means variable resistance sensor - so there are more than one in the pedal - for safety reason. Details are in RAVE.
With Nanocom you can change this setting - it is in the same place, like injectors settings.
I have experience, that with 2 way pedal and ECU switched to 3 way, I get similar fault in ECU and car will only idle. "Drobek" = The Small One - Discovery 2, "Blufínek" = The Blue Thing - Defender 130, and for me at least Ford Mondeo Smile
Post #594308 19th Jan 2017 9:16am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4395
United Kingdom 
4RF RDS wrote:
Okay you could try clearing them (again) and then disconnect the battery and hold the pos and neg together (neither connected to the battery) for about a minute. Reconnect and try reading codes again. If the codes remain time for some further digging or a better diagnostic like a Nanocom or testbook.


Thanks for the tip, will give that a go. I actually have a Nanocom (quite frankly the best christmas present ever...) and that is where the fault codes came from. It has also highlighted that after nearly 170k miles the injectors are a little erratic, or at least the cylinder balance values are. But that is the topic for another thread I thnk.

psimpson7 wrote:
Its not unheard of for them to fail although its quite unusual.

I had one fail on mine when it was a TD5 and still under warranty. They replaced it straight away and after that I always carried a spare new one just in case.


So I see from a google search last night. Also from those searches it appears the more frequent cause of this error appears to be chaffing of the wiring loom.

MadTom wrote:
There are two types of pedals for TD5 - older with 2 ways and newer with 3 ways. Way means variable resistance sensor - so there are more than one in the pedal - for safety reason. Details are in RAVE.
With Nanocom you can change this setting - it is in the same place, like injectors settings.
I have experience, that with 2 way pedal and ECU switched to 3 way, I get similar fault in ECU and car will only idle.


Ok, so being a 2003 TD5 I am likely to have a 3 track pedal. So I need to test the resistance of the tracks. I notice on the nanocom feed that track 1 shows a reverse voltage, is this normal?


Click image to enlarge
Post #594362 19th Jan 2017 12:20pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MadTom



Member Since: 10 Sep 2013
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 572
Czech Republic 1999 Defender 130 Td5 HCPU Baltic Blue
Look into the RAVE - there is detailed description of the pedal resistance. And yes, it is OK, 2 main ways works in opposite - safety reason for possible short in wires. ECU is sensing both ways and comparing them. In case of a short, the car will not increase the speed by it self. Third way is for better precision of control. "Drobek" = The Small One - Discovery 2, "Blufínek" = The Blue Thing - Defender 130, and for me at least Ford Mondeo Smile
Post #594365 19th Jan 2017 12:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4395
United Kingdom 
Yup, don't have RAVE... But thanks for the response. All good with the voltages then...
Post #594367 19th Jan 2017 12:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16871
United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
On the TD5 with a three track throttle position pot it is normal for one track to be reversed. The idea is that the sum of the reverse track and one non-reverse track should be a constant voltage, this is monitored in the ECU for fault detection purposes.
Post #594377 19th Jan 2017 12:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4395
United Kingdom 
blackwolf wrote:
On the TD5 with a three track throttle position pot it is normal for one track to be reversed. The idea is that the sum of the reverse track and one non-reverse track should be a constant voltage, this is monitored in the ECU for fault detection purposes.


Super. So that must be where the "accelerator Supply (V)" data comes from then. In which case that data should show (providing all is A-OK) an almost constant 5(ish) volts... right?
Post #594382 19th Jan 2017 1:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
derbywill



Member Since: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 539
England 2005 Defender 90 Td5 XS CSW Java Black
I would check the wiring or just rewire the pedal to the ECU as the wiring can also give problems!

Will 2005 90 XS
1954 86'' Series 1 tilt
Post #594392 19th Jan 2017 1:31pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Disco_Mikey



Member Since: 16 Nov 2014
Location: Dundee
Posts: 531
Scotland 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Keswick Green
As above. Wiring issue between the ECU and pedal

As a temporary repair, it can be programmed to a 2 track pedal Thumbs Up
Post #594398 19th Jan 2017 1:52pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dorsetsmith



Member Since: 30 Oct 2011
Location: South West
Posts: 4554
Not the oil in the plug problem ?
Post #594406 19th Jan 2017 2:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
<  Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums