↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Stolen > Land Rover vandalised - Croydon
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Land Rover vandalised - Croydon
Post #408600 18th Mar 2015 9:08am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JWL



Member Since: 26 Oct 2011
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3443

England 2002 Defender 110 Td5 SW Coniston Green
I know that behind this may be a contentious subject, the Land Rover belongs to an Anti-Hunt Group but if you read the report there's quite a misnomer from one of the anti's making you wonder why they do what they do...........


"Hunt saboteurs spend their time disrupting the lawful activity of many hunts and shoots. I don't see why we should be a particular focus of their enquiries."



Read more: http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/Croydon...z3UiysQQS8
Follow us: @CroydonAd on Twitter | croydonadvertiser on Facebook
Post #408608 18th Mar 2015 9:36am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
steventheplumber



Member Since: 29 Apr 2014
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 767

England 1987 Defender 90 200 Tdi HT Keswick Green
That's an expensive fix
Post #409011 19th Mar 2015 4:37pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16953

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
I was myself wondering how two tyre valves added up to "repairs costing several hundred pounds".

Must almost be a write-off!
Post #409024 19th Mar 2015 5:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
I'm wondering if you'd write off those tyres given how flat they are - maybe there's a chance of sidewall /carcass damage. That and a flatbed truck to the tyre shop won't leave much change from a few hundred.
Post #409196 20th Mar 2015 10:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
mobile tyre van , wheel off , break one bead , cut old valve out , fit new valve , blow up, fit wheel , 5-10 min job

if the vans already out on jobs 50 quid job done

as long as you don't drive it , its much the same as coming out in the morning to a nail in tyre and sitting flat overnight , repair blow up and check it
Post #409204 20th Mar 2015 10:41am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
It's an insurance...
Post #409207 20th Mar 2015 11:01am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
insurance excess will be more than just getting it done + the waiting around
Post #409226 20th Mar 2015 12:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 16953

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
JWL wrote:
I know that behind this may be a contentious subject, the Land Rover belongs to an Anti-Hunt Group but if you read the report there's quite a misnomer from one of the anti's making you wonder why they do what they do...........


"Hunt saboteurs spend their time disrupting the lawful activity of many hunts and shoots. I don't see why we should be a particular focus of their enquiries."

...


That quote is attributed to one Geoff Stovold, who is secretary of the Old Surrey, Burstow and West Kent hunt, not to an 'anti'.

Mr Stovold seems to be objecting to the enquiry's focus on the hunt, by suggesting that since the hunt's activities are legal, yet are disrupted by the 'antis', then inflicting criminal damage to a vehicle used by the 'antis' is somehow morally justified.

This, it seems to me, rather surrenders the moral high ground.
Post #409250 20th Mar 2015 1:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums